Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMBX vs FASCX
BAMBX vs FASCX Comparison
Open Charts BAMBX vs FASCX
BAMBX vs FASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMBX vs. FASCX commentary
Jun 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMBX is a Hold and FASCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.97B vs. FASCX (590M). BAMBX pays higher dividends than FASCX: BAMBX (1.97) vs FASCX (1.40). BAMBX was incepted earlier than FASCX: BAMBX (11 years) vs FASCX (13 years). FASCX (3.47) is less costly to investors than BAMBX (1.21). BAMBX (270.00) and FASCX (266.59) have comparable annual turnover. BAMBX (1000) and FASCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FASCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.34 vs. BAMBX (1.67). BAMBX return over 5 years is better than : 15.05 vs. FASCX (-1.33).
| BAMBX | FASCX | BAMBX / FASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 3.18 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 3.47 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.386 | 4.116 | -9% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.97B | 590M | 1,351% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.97 | 1.40 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.67 | 5.34 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.56 | 13.73 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.05 | -1.33 | -1,129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.61 | 15.02 | 210% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement