Ad is loading...
BAMBX vs FASCX
BAMBX vs FASCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMBX vs. FASCX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMBX is a Hold and FASCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.64B vs. FASCX (518M). FASCX pays higher dividends than BAMBX: FASCX (5.25) vs BAMBX (3.74). BAMBX was incepted earlier than FASCX: BAMBX (10 years) vs FASCX (12 years). FASCX (3.53) is less costly to investors than BAMBX (1.21). FASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 257.70 vs. BAMBX (242.00). BAMBX (1000) and FASCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. BAMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.01 vs. FASCX (-0.59). BAMBX return over 5 years is better than : 18.31 vs. FASCX (3.97).
| BAMBX | FASCX | BAMBX / FASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 3.19 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 3.53 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.577 | 0.190 | 1,358% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.64B | 518M | 1,475% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.74 | 5.25 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.01 | -0.59 | -1,010% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.70 | 4.84 | 324% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.31 | 3.97 | 462% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 3.30 | - |