BAMXF
Price
$91.88
Change
-$1.12 (-1.20%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
80.42B
BCAUF
Price
$0.41
Change
-$0.04 (-8.89%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
2.81B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAMXF vs BCAUF

Header iconBAMXF vs BCAUF Comparison
Open Charts BAMXF vs BCAUFBanner chart's image
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
Price$91.88
Change-$1.12 (-1.20%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization80.42B
Brilliance China Automotive Holding
Price$0.41
Change-$0.04 (-8.89%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization2.81B
BAMXF vs BCAUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BAMXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAMXF vs. BCAUF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMXF is a Hold and BCAUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BAMXF: $91.88 vs. BCAUF: $0.41)
Brand notoriety: BAMXF and BCAUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAMXF: 111% vs. BCAUF: 9%
Market capitalization -- BAMXF: $80.42B vs. BCAUF: $2.81B
BAMXF [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $80.42B. BCAUF’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $2.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $559.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $35.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAMXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBCAUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BAMXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BCAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAMXF is a better buy in the long-term than BCAUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAMXF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BCAUF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAMXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BCAUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAMXF is a better buy in the short-term than BCAUF.

Price Growth

BAMXF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +10.12% price change this week, while BCAUF (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -10.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.28%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (+1.58% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAMXF($80.4B) has a higher market cap than BCAUF($2.81B). BAMXF has higher P/E ratio than BCAUF: BAMXF (6.37) vs BCAUF (3.50). BAMXF YTD gains are higher at: 12.592 vs. BCAUF (-11.957).
BAMXFBCAUFBAMXF / BCAUF
Capitalization80.4B2.81B2,861%
EBITDA25.8BN/A-
Gain YTD12.592-11.957-105%
P/E Ratio6.373.50182%
Revenue148BN/A-
Total Cash22.4BN/A-
Total Debt71.6BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAMXF vs BCAUF: Fundamental Ratings
BAMXF
BCAUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7897
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
64100
SMR RATING
1..100
8045
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4848
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2071
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAMXF's Valuation (53) in the null industry is in the same range as BCAUF (75). This means that BAMXF’s stock grew similarly to BCAUF’s over the last 12 months.

BAMXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCAUF (100). This means that BAMXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCAUF’s over the last 12 months.

BCAUF's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAMXF (80). This means that BCAUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAMXF’s over the last 12 months.

BCAUF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as BAMXF (48). This means that BCAUF’s stock grew similarly to BAMXF’s over the last 12 months.

BAMXF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCAUF (71). This means that BAMXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCAUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMXFBCAUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAMXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LTRX3.010.13
+4.51%
Lantronix
MRCY51.430.93
+1.84%
Mercury Systems
KREF9.000.03
+0.33%
KKR Real Estate Finance Trust
IBIO0.74N/A
+0.14%
iBio
KOF97.310.14
+0.14%
Coca-Cola FEMSA SAB DE CV

BAMXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAMXF has been loosely correlated with MBGYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BAMXF jumps, then MBGYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAMXF
1D Price
Change %
BAMXF100%
-1.21%
MBGYY - BAMXF
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
MBGAF - BAMXF
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.82%
POAHY - BAMXF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
VWAGY - BAMXF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
STLA - BAMXF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
More

BCAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCAUF and AYRO have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCAUF and AYRO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCAUF
1D Price
Change %
BCAUF100%
N/A
AYRO - BCAUF
11%
Poorly correlated
-4.67%
AMGDF - BCAUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BAMXF - BCAUF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
NIO - BCAUF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
BCCMY - BCAUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More