BANC
Price
$17.05
Change
+$0.62 (+3.77%)
Updated
Sep 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.59B
40 days until earnings call
BKU
Price
$39.51
Change
+$1.36 (+3.56%)
Updated
Sep 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.85B
28 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BANC vs BKU

Header iconBANC vs BKU Comparison
Open Charts BANC vs BKUBanner chart's image
Banc of California
Price$17.05
Change+$0.62 (+3.77%)
Volume$49.2K
Capitalization2.59B
Bankunited
Price$39.51
Change+$1.36 (+3.56%)
Volume$8.85K
Capitalization2.85B
BANC vs BKU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BKU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BANC vs. BKU commentary
Sep 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BANC is a StrongBuy and BKU is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BANC: $16.44 vs. BKU: $38.15)
Brand notoriety: BANC and BKU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BANC: 108% vs. BKU: 163%
Market capitalization -- BANC: $2.59B vs. BKU: $2.85B
BANC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.59B. BKU’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.85B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $168.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BANC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBKU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BANC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BKU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BKU is a better buy in the long-term than BANC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BANC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BKU’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BANC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BKU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BKU is a better buy in the short-term than BANC.

Price Growth

BANC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.67% price change this week, while BKU (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

BANC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

BKU is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.42% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKU($2.85B) has a higher market cap than BANC($2.59B). BANC has higher P/E ratio than BKU: BANC (25.29) vs BKU (11.22). BANC YTD gains are higher at: 8.581 vs. BKU (2.604). BANC (2.87B) and BKU (2.96B) have identical debt. BKU (1.05B) and BANC (1B) have equivalent revenues.
BANCBKUBANC / BKU
Capitalization2.59B2.85B91%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.5812.604329%
P/E Ratio25.2911.22225%
Revenue1B1.05B96%
Total Cash222MN/A-
Total Debt2.87B2.96B97%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BANC vs BKU: Fundamental Ratings
BANC
BKU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
818
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6157
SMR RATING
1..100
1313
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4551
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7084
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2337

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BKU's Valuation (37) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BANC (77). This means that BKU’s stock grew somewhat faster than BANC’s over the last 12 months.

BKU's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BANC (61). This means that BKU’s stock grew similarly to BANC’s over the last 12 months.

BKU's SMR Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BANC (13). This means that BKU’s stock grew similarly to BANC’s over the last 12 months.

BANC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BKU (51). This means that BANC’s stock grew similarly to BKU’s over the last 12 months.

BANC's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BKU (84). This means that BANC’s stock grew similarly to BKU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BANCBKU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BKU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSBFX26.84N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Income Builder A
MDDLX8.22N/A
N/A
MassMutual Diversified Value Adm
MWOBX50.92N/A
N/A
MFS Global Growth B
GILCX46.76N/A
N/A
NAA Large Cap Value Institutional
RGLHX27.53-0.07
-0.25%
American Funds Global Insight R-2E

BANC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BANC has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BANC jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BANC
1D Price
Change %
BANC100%
+0.18%
FNB - BANC
86%
Closely correlated
+1.37%
COLB - BANC
85%
Closely correlated
+1.81%
UCB - BANC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
TRMK - BANC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.89%
BKU - BANC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.63%
More