BANFP | BBT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 14 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 64 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BANFP's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as BBT (17) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BANFP’s stock grew similarly to BBT’s over the last 12 months.
BANFP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BBT (100) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BANFP’s stock grew similarly to BBT’s over the last 12 months.
BBT's SMR Rating (14) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BANFP (100) in the null industry. This means that BBT’s stock grew significantly faster than BANFP’s over the last 12 months.
BANFP's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as BBT (58) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BANFP’s stock grew similarly to BBT’s over the last 12 months.
BBT's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BANFP (100) in the null industry. This means that BBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BANFP’s over the last 12 months.
| BANFP | BBT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 29% | 3 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 14% | 3 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 11% | 3 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 15% | 3 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 15% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 19% | 21 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 6% | 3 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 18% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 31% | 3 days ago 76% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BANFP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while BBT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BANFP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BBT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BANFP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.13% price change this week, while BBT (@Regional Banks) price change was -10.31% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.80%.
BBT is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JETD | 3.21 | 0.01 | +0.32% |
| MAX Airlines - 3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (JETD) | |||
| TCHP | 51.82 | 0.06 | +0.12% |
| T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) | |||
| SSPY | 98.20 | 0.05 | +0.05% |
| Stratified LargeCap Index ETF (SSPY) | |||
| OAKG | 26.89 | N/A | N/A |
| Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF (OAKG) | |||
| BKMS | 25.18 | -0.03 | -0.12% |
| BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF (BKMS) | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that BANFP and BBT have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BANFP and BBT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BANFP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BANFP | 100% | -2.05% | ||
| BBT - BANFP | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.15% | ||
| BAFN - BANFP | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.88% | ||
| CNOBP - BANFP | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.20% | ||
| UVSP - BANFP | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.74% | ||
| MNSBP - BANFP | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBT has been closely correlated with CPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBT jumps, then CPF could also see price increases.