BAP
Price
$168.64
Change
+$3.88 (+2.35%)
Updated
May 3, 6:59 PM EST
4 days until earnings call
GGAL
Price
$34.32
Change
+$2.47 (+7.76%)
Updated
May 3, 6:59 PM EST
17 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Compare trend and price BAP vs GGAL

Header iconBAP vs GGAL Comparison
Open Charts BAP vs GGALBanner chart's image
Credi
Price$168.64
Change+$3.88 (+2.35%)
Volume$52.85K
CapitalizationN/A
Grupo Financiero Galicia SA
Price$34.32
Change+$2.47 (+7.76%)
Volume$806.75K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BAP vs GGAL Comparison Chart

Loading...

BAPDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
GGALDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
BAP vs. GGAL commentary
May 06, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAP is a StrongBuy and GGAL is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 06, 2024
Stock price -- (BAP: $168.64 vs. GGAL: $34.32)
Brand notoriety: BAP and GGAL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAP: 86% vs. GGAL: 145%
Market capitalization -- BAP: $13.47B vs. GGAL: $4.87B
BAP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $13.47B. GGAL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGGAL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GGAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GGAL is a better buy in the long-term than BAP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GGAL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GGAL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BAP and GGAL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.95% price change this week, while GGAL (@Regional Banks) price change was +11.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAP is expected to report earnings on Aug 08, 2024.

GGAL is expected to report earnings on Aug 29, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.20% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for BAP with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for GGAL with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAP($13.5B) has a higher market cap than GGAL($4.87B). GGAL has higher P/E ratio than BAP: GGAL (58.02) vs BAP (10.41). GGAL YTD gains are higher at: 98.784 vs. BAP (12.479). GGAL has higher revenues than BAP: GGAL (693B) vs BAP (21.6B).
BAPGGALBAP / GGAL
Capitalization13.5B4.87B277%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.47998.78413%
P/E Ratio10.4158.0218%
Revenue21.6B693B3%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt25.4BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAP vs GGAL: Fundamental Ratings
BAP
GGAL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10056
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4335
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3617
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
195

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAP's Valuation (83) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as GGAL (89). This means that BAP’s stock grew similarly to GGAL’s over the last 12 months.

GGAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAP (100). This means that GGAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAP’s over the last 12 months.

GGAL's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BAP (4). This means that GGAL’s stock grew similarly to BAP’s over the last 12 months.

GGAL's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BAP (43). This means that GGAL’s stock grew similarly to BAP’s over the last 12 months.

GGAL's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BAP (36). This means that GGAL’s stock grew similarly to BAP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAPGGAL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAPDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
GGALDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEAM1.390.11
+8.59%
5E Advanced Materials
UPBD30.770.39
+1.28%
Upbound Group
LEVI22.000.08
+0.36%
Levi Strauss & Co
OLP23.15-0.08
-0.34%
One Liberty Properties
JFBR0.25-0.01
-4.03%
Jeffs' Brands Ltd

GGAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGAL has been closely correlated with BMA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GGAL jumps, then BMA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGAL
1D Price
Change %
GGAL100%
+7.62%
BMA - GGAL
90%
Closely correlated
+7.32%
BBAR - GGAL
90%
Closely correlated
+9.27%
SUPV - GGAL
85%
Closely correlated
+5.53%
SBNY - GGAL
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
BAP - GGAL
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.38%
More