BAP
Price
$195.74
Change
+$3.19 (+1.66%)
Updated
Apr 24, 02:17 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.47B
21 days until earnings call
IFS
Price
$32.01
Change
-$0.20 (-0.62%)
Updated
Apr 24, 02:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.77B
14 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BAP vs IFS

Header iconBAP vs IFS Comparison
Open Charts BAP vs IFSBanner chart's image
Credi
Price$195.74
Change+$3.19 (+1.66%)
Volume$100
Capitalization13.47B
Intercorp Financial Services
Price$32.01
Change-$0.20 (-0.62%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.77B
BAP vs IFS Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAP vs. IFS commentary
Apr 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAP is a Buy and IFS is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 24, 2025
Stock price -- (BAP: $192.55 vs. IFS: $32.21)
Brand notoriety: BAP and IFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAP: 76% vs. IFS: 90%
Market capitalization -- BAP: $13.47B vs. IFS: $2.77B
BAP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $13.47B. IFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IFS is a better buy in the long-term than BAP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAP’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAP’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • IFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAP is a better buy in the short-term than IFS.

Price Growth

BAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.97% price change this week, while IFS (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +7.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAP is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2025.

IFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+7.13% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAP($13.5B) has a higher market cap than IFS($2.77B). BAP has higher P/E ratio than IFS: BAP (10.41) vs IFS (9.76). IFS YTD gains are higher at: 9.782 vs. BAP (5.035). IFS has less debt than BAP: IFS (10.4B) vs BAP (25.4B). BAP has higher revenues than IFS: BAP (21.6B) vs IFS (6.82B).
BAPIFSBAP / IFS
Capitalization13.5B2.77B487%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.0359.78251%
P/E Ratio10.419.76107%
Revenue21.6B6.82B317%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt25.4B10.4B244%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAP vs IFS: Fundamental Ratings
BAP
IFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
825
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2540
SMR RATING
1..100
36
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4744
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4328
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IFS's Valuation (46) in the null industry is in the same range as BAP (73) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to BAP’s over the last 12 months.

BAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (40) in the null industry. This means that BAP’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

BAP's SMR Rating (3) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (6) in the null industry. This means that BAP’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as BAP (47) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to BAP’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as BAP (43) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to BAP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAPIFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MFT.X0.0019540.000298
+18.01%
Mainframe cryptocurrency
SUSHI.X0.6748100.033178
+5.17%
SushiSwap cryptocurrency
OG.X4.0346190.100816
+2.56%
OG Fan Token cryptocurrency
MKR.X1486.07460035.928833
+2.48%
Maker cryptocurrency
MAGIC.X0.196866-0.026917
-12.03%
Treasure cryptocurrency

BAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAP has been loosely correlated with BSAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BAP jumps, then BSAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAP
1D Price
Change %
BAP100%
+0.67%
BSAC - BAP
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
IFS - BAP
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.87%
BCH - BAP
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.84%
GGAL - BAP
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.42%
SBNY - BAP
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

IFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFS has been loosely correlated with BAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFS jumps, then BAP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFS
1D Price
Change %
IFS100%
+1.87%
BAP - IFS
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
BSAC - IFS
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
EWBC - IFS
35%
Loosely correlated
+6.60%
BPOP - IFS
34%
Loosely correlated
+5.93%
BCH - IFS
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.84%
More