BAP
Price
$225.78
Change
+$5.23 (+2.37%)
Updated
Jul 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.47B
28 days until earnings call
IFS
Price
$37.61
Change
+$0.67 (+1.81%)
Updated
Jul 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.77B
25 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAP vs IFS

Header iconBAP vs IFS Comparison
Open Charts BAP vs IFSBanner chart's image
Credi
Price$225.78
Change+$5.23 (+2.37%)
Volume$2.28K
Capitalization13.47B
Intercorp Financial Services
Price$37.61
Change+$0.67 (+1.81%)
Volume$400
Capitalization2.77B
BAP vs IFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAP vs. IFS commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAP is a Hold and IFS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BAP: $225.57 vs. IFS: $36.94)
Brand notoriety: BAP and IFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAP: 101% vs. IFS: 58%
Market capitalization -- BAP: $13.47B vs. IFS: $2.77B
BAP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $13.47B. IFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BAP and IFS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAP’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • IFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IFS is a better buy in the short-term than BAP.

Price Growth

BAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.92% price change this week, while IFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAP is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

IFS is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.22% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAP($13.5B) has a higher market cap than IFS($2.77B). BAP has higher P/E ratio than IFS: BAP (10.41) vs IFS (9.76). BAP YTD gains are higher at: 37.605 vs. IFS (29.937). IFS has less debt than BAP: IFS (10.4B) vs BAP (25.4B). BAP has higher revenues than IFS: BAP (21.6B) vs IFS (6.82B).
BAPIFSBAP / IFS
Capitalization13.5B2.77B487%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD37.60529.937126%
P/E Ratio10.419.76107%
Revenue21.6B6.82B317%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt25.4B10.4B244%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAP vs IFS: Fundamental Ratings
BAP
IFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6357
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2042
SMR RATING
1..100
47
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4142
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3837
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IFS's Valuation (76) in the null industry is in the same range as BAP (89) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to BAP’s over the last 12 months.

BAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (42) in the null industry. This means that BAP’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

BAP's SMR Rating (4) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (7) in the null industry. This means that BAP’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

BAP's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (42) in the null industry. This means that BAP’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as BAP (38) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to BAP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAPIFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CVAIX24.000.04
+0.17%
Calamos Select Fund I
CMVYX13.84N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Instl 3
PGRQX20.16N/A
N/A
PGIM Global Real Estate R6
SPVYX22.01N/A
N/A
SEI Small Cap Value Y (SIMT)
PNAIX78.73N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price All-Cap Opportunities-I