BAP
Price
$182.13
Change
+$1.96 (+1.09%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
50 days until earnings call
IFS
Price
$29.04
Change
+$0.10 (+0.35%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
57 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BAP vs IFS

Header iconBAP vs IFS Comparison
Open Charts BAP vs IFSBanner chart's image
Credi
Price$182.13
Change+$1.96 (+1.09%)
Volume$415.34K
CapitalizationN/A
Intercorp Financial Services
Price$29.04
Change+$0.10 (+0.35%)
Volume$45.53K
CapitalizationN/A
BAP vs IFS Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAP vs. IFS commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAP is a Hold and IFS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (BAP: $182.13 vs. IFS: $29.04)
Brand notoriety: BAP and IFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAP: 162% vs. IFS: 27%
Market capitalization -- BAP: $13.47B vs. IFS: $2.77B
BAP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $13.47B. IFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IFS is a better buy in the long-term than BAP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • IFS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAP is a better buy in the short-term than IFS.

Price Growth

BAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.96% price change this week, while IFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAP is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2025.

IFS is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAP($13.5B) has a higher market cap than IFS($2.77B). BAP has higher P/E ratio than IFS: BAP (10.41) vs IFS (9.76). IFS YTD gains are higher at: 38.463 vs. BAP (32.687). IFS has less debt than BAP: IFS (10.4B) vs BAP (25.4B). BAP has higher revenues than IFS: BAP (21.6B) vs IFS (6.82B).
BAPIFSBAP / IFS
Capitalization13.5B2.77B487%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD32.68738.46385%
P/E Ratio10.419.76107%
Revenue21.6B6.82B317%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt25.4B10.4B244%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAP vs IFS: Fundamental Ratings
BAP
IFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6270
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
76100
SMR RATING
1..100
47
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4741
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5032
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6595

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IFS's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as BAP (79) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to BAP’s over the last 12 months.

BAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (100) in the null industry. This means that BAP’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

BAP's SMR Rating (4) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (7) in the null industry. This means that BAP’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as BAP (47) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to BAP’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as BAP (50) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to BAP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAPIFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VRREX18.630.30
+1.64%
Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Secs R6
GIZRX12.090.16
+1.34%
Invesco Global Infrastructure R
MRCGX31.940.32
+1.01%
Meridian Growth C
AMFCX54.280.54
+1.00%
American Funds American Mutual C
FTGRX25.350.13
+0.53%
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock M