BAR
Price
$40.00
Change
-$0.33 (-0.82%)
Updated
Nov 6 closing price
Net Assets
1.26B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GLDM
Price
$80.41
Change
-$0.65 (-0.80%)
Updated
Nov 6 closing price
Net Assets
29.75B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAR vs GLDM

BAR vs GLDM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 21, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR) vs. SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM)

Key Takeaways

  • Both BAR and GLDM are physically backed grantor trusts that track the LBMA Gold Price PM, delivering nearly identical exposure to spot gold prices minus expenses.
  • GLDM carries a lower expense ratio of 0.10% compared with 0.17% for BAR, providing a structural cost advantage over time.
  • Each fund holds physical gold stored in London vaults and maintains a single-asset structure with no equity holdings or sector allocations beyond precious metals.
  • Liquidity profiles differ, with GLDM generally exhibiting higher average daily trading volume than BAR in recent market cycles.
  • Both ETFs serve as cost-effective vehicles for gold exposure within broader portfolios, with performance driven by macroeconomic factors such as interest rates, inflation expectations, and geopolitical developments.
  • Structural similarities position the funds as close substitutes, with the primary differentiator being the expense ratio and secondary considerations around trading liquidity.

Introduction

GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) represent two physically backed gold exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that compete directly for investors seeking straightforward exposure to gold prices. Both funds track the same benchmark and employ identical grantor-trust structures, making them close alternatives rather than complementary strategies. In the current environment of fluctuating interest-rate expectations and ongoing geopolitical uncertainty, these ETFs allow investors to compare cost efficiency and liquidity within the same thematic exposure.

GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR) Overview

The GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR) is a passively managed grantor trust that seeks to reflect the performance of the LBMA Gold Price PM, less expenses and liabilities. The fund holds physical gold bars stored in London vaults and maintains a single holding structure. Its expense ratio stands at 0.17%. As a grantor trust, BAR provides direct ownership exposure to allocated gold without lending or rehypothecation. The fund does not track an equity index and carries no sector allocations outside precious metals.

SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) Overview

The SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) is a passively managed grantor trust sponsored by State Street Global Advisors. It aims to track the LBMA Gold Price PM, less expenses. The fund holds physical gold in London vaults and features a single-asset structure. Its expense ratio is 0.10%. Like BAR, GLDM is structured as a grantor trust with no equity holdings or traditional sector diversification. The lower fee structure represents its primary distinguishing characteristic relative to peer gold ETFs.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the precious-metals commodity sector, where gold serves as a hedge against inflation, currency fluctuations, and geopolitical risk. Macroeconomic drivers include central-bank monetary policy, real interest rates, and global safe-haven demand. Recent market cycles have featured sustained investor interest in gold amid persistent inflation concerns and evolving interest-rate trajectories. Regulatory oversight remains stable for physically backed grantor trusts, with no material changes affecting fund operations. Sector risks center on storage costs, custody arrangements, and potential shifts in investor sentiment toward alternative assets.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, both BAR and GLDM have exhibited highly correlated price movements driven by the underlying gold spot price. Relative positioning favors the lower-cost GLDM for longer-term holders due to reduced expense drag. Volatility profiles remain similar, reflecting gold’s sensitivity to macroeconomic data releases and geopolitical events. In broader market rotations, both funds have served as defensive exposures during periods of equity-market uncertainty, with performance differentials attributable primarily to fee structures rather than strategy differences.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities with the AI Screener.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of preference to GLDM. The lower expense ratio provides a durable cost advantage that compounds over time, while the fund maintains identical gold exposure and grantor-trust protections as BAR. In environments where sector momentum and cost efficiency are prioritized, GLDM demonstrates a modest edge in overall positioning.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BAR vs. GLDM commentary
Nov 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAR is a Buy and GLDM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for BAR with price predictions
Nov 06, 2026

BAR in upward trend: price may ascend as a result of having broken its lower Bollinger Band on October 30, 2026

BAR may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 25 of 27 cases where BAR's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where BAR's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 14 of 17 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 05, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on BAR as a result. In 79 of 89 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 89%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for BAR just turned positive on November 05, 2026. Looking at past instances where BAR's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 43 of 49 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 88%.

Following a +4.59% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where BAR advanced for three days, in 275 of 328 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator entered the overbought zone. Expect a price pull-back in the foreseeable future.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where BAR declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.

The Aroon Indicator for BAR entered a downward trend on November 06, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for GLDM with price predictions
Nov 06, 2026

GLDM in upward trend: price may ascend as a result of having broken its lower Bollinger Band on October 30, 2026

GLDM may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 24 of 26 cases where GLDM's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where GLDM's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 12 of 16 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 05, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on GLDM as a result. In 79 of 88 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for GLDM just turned positive on November 05, 2026. Looking at past instances where GLDM's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 42 of 48 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 88%.

Following a +4.55% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where GLDM advanced for three days, in 273 of 325 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator entered the overbought zone. Expect a price pull-back in the foreseeable future.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where GLDM declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 66%.

The Aroon Indicator for GLDM entered a downward trend on November 06, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BARGLDM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NMCO9.030.10
+1.12%
Nuveen Municipal Credit Opportunities Fund
IBIG25.39N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG)
EMLC24.62-0.03
-0.12%
VanEck J. P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC)
MCDS65.45-0.14
-0.21%
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS)
CAFG32.04-0.40
-1.24%
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG)