Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BARAX vs FSMAX
BARAX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BARAX vs FSMAX
BARAX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BARAX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BARAX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. BARAX (3.8B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BARAX: FSMAX (0.48) vs BARAX (0.00). BARAX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BARAX (39 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). BARAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. BARAX (6.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BARAX: FSMAX (0) vs BARAX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.38 vs. BARAX (-3.42). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.12 vs. BARAX (-24.55).
| BARAX | FSMAX | BARAX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.04 | 3,743% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.04 | 3,743% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.475 | 15.913 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.8B | 43.5B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.42 | 24.38 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.70 | 63.28 | -9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.55 | 39.12 | -63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.23 | 139.20 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement