Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BARAX vs FSMAX
BARAX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BARAX vs FSMAX
BARAX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BARAX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BARAX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. BARAX (3.46B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BARAX: FSMAX (0.50) vs BARAX (0.00). BARAX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BARAX (39 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). BARAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. BARAX (6.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BARAX: FSMAX (0) vs BARAX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. BARAX (-9.90). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. BARAX (-31.62).
| BARAX | FSMAX | BARAX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.04 | 3,743% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.04 | 3,743% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.487 | 13.370 | -26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.46B | 40.1B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.90 | 20.57 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.55 | 55.83 | -21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.62 | 33.18 | -95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.10 | 133.82 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement