Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BASAX vs WCMLX
BASAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts BASAX vs WCMLX
BASAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BASAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BASAX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BASAX has more cash in the bank: 551M vs. WCMLX (49.7M). BASAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . BASAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: BASAX (20 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than BASAX (1.36). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. BASAX (28.00). BASAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: BASAX (100) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.32 vs. BASAX (-0.67). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.51 vs. BASAX (-32.51).
| BASAX | WCMLX | BASAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.99 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.79 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.158 | 6.541 | 232% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 551M | 49.7M | 1,109% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.67 | 9.32 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.43 | 22.37 | -2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.51 | -7.51 | 433% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.91 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement