Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BASIX vs ECGMX
BASIX vs ECGMX Comparison
Open Charts BASIX vs ECGMX
BASIX vs ECGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BASIX vs. ECGMX commentary
Aug 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BASIX is a Hold and ECGMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BASIX has more cash in the bank: 48.4B vs. ECGMX (4.18B). ECGMX pays higher dividends than BASIX: ECGMX (5.55) vs BASIX (4.50). BASIX was incepted earlier than ECGMX: BASIX (19 years) vs ECGMX (17 years). ECGMX (2.26) is less costly to investors than BASIX (0.99). BASIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1006.00 vs. ECGMX (142.00). BASIX (1000) and ECGMX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ECGMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.39 vs. BASIX (4.14). ECGMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.40 vs. BASIX (13.17).
| BASIX | ECGMX | BASIX / ECGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 2.26 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 2.26 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.395 | 4.803 | 29% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.4B | 4.18B | 1,159% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.50 | 5.55 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.14 | 10.39 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.05 | 27.31 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.17 | 30.40 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.03 | 46.55 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement