Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATEX vs NHMFX
BATEX vs NHMFX Comparison
Open Charts BATEX vs NHMFX
BATEX vs NHMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATEX vs. NHMFX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATEX is a Hold and NHMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMFX has more cash in the bank: 12.7B vs. BATEX (682M). NHMFX pays higher dividends than BATEX: NHMFX (5.67) vs BATEX (5.09). BATEX was incepted earlier than NHMFX: BATEX (12 years) vs NHMFX (10 years). NHMFX (1.77) is less costly to investors than BATEX (0.15). BATEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NHMFX (18.00). BATEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHMFX: BATEX (0) vs NHMFX (1000000). NHMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.19 vs. BATEX (7.73). BATEX return over 5 years is better than : 5.04 vs. NHMFX (2.08).
| BATEX | NHMFX | BATEX / NHMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.06 | 1.77 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 1.77 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.920 | 3.342 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 682M | 12.7B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.09 | 5.67 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.73 | 9.19 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.37 | 12.39 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.04 | 2.08 | 242% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.90 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers