Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATEX vs NHMFX
BATEX vs NHMFX Comparison
Open Charts BATEX vs NHMFX
BATEX vs NHMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATEX vs. NHMFX commentary
Aug 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATEX is a Hold and NHMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMFX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. BATEX (707M). NHMFX pays higher dividends than BATEX: NHMFX (5.77) vs BATEX (4.65). BATEX was incepted earlier than NHMFX: BATEX (12 years) vs NHMFX (10 years). NHMFX (1.77) is less costly to investors than BATEX (0.23). BATEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. NHMFX (15.00). BATEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHMFX: BATEX (0) vs NHMFX (1000000). NHMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.22 vs. BATEX (7.32). BATEX return over 5 years is better than : 2.12 vs. NHMFX (-0.32).
| BATEX | NHMFX | BATEX / NHMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.16 | 1.77 | 9% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.23 | 1.77 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.918 | 2.160 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 707M | 12.5B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.65 | 5.77 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.32 | 9.22 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.82 | 14.12 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.12 | -0.32 | -666% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.55 | 27.85 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers