Ad is loading...
BATT vs LITP
BATT vs LITP Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs LITP
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$8.97
Change-$0.14 (-1.54%)
Volume$19.96K
Net Assets63.44M
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$6.48
Change-$0.17 (-2.56%)
Volume$2.63K
Net Assets6.08M
BATT vs LITP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. LITP commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and LITP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 63.4M vs. LITP (6.08M). BATT has a higher annual dividend yield than LITP: BATT (1.932) vs LITP (-2.994). BATT was incepted earlier than LITP: BATT (7 years) vs LITP (2 years). LITP has a higher turnover BATT (42.00) vs BATT (42.00).
| BATT | LITP | BATT / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | 1.932 | -2.994 | -65% |
| Net Assets | 63.4M | 6.08M | 1,044% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 59.00 | 71% |
| Yield | 3.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 13 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -1.52% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -4.12% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| NIO - BATT | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.60% | ||
More | ||||
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | -2.56% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | -4.12% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.95% | ||
More | ||||