Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs LITP
BATT vs LITP Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs LITP
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$10.24
Change+$0.20 (+1.99%)
Volume$453
Net Assets62.96M
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$6.99
Change+$0.19 (+2.79%)
Volume$100
Net Assets17.54M
BATT vs LITP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. LITP commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and LITP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 63M vs. LITP (17.5M). BATT has a higher annual dividend yield than LITP: BATT (14.091) vs LITP (1.722). BATT was incepted earlier than LITP: BATT (7 years) vs LITP (3 years). BATT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than LITP (0.65). BATT has a higher turnover LITP (49.00) vs LITP (49.00).
| BATT | LITP | BATT / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | 14.091 | 1.722 | 818% |
| Net Assets | 63M | 17.5M | 360% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.65 | 91% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 49.00 | 141% |
| Yield | 2.82 | 6.71 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 8 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +0.30% | ||
| FCX - BATT | 75% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 71% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 70% Closely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| HBM - BATT | 68% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | +4.22% | ||
More | ||||
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | -1.96% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | -2.58% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.66% | ||
More | ||||