Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs LITP
BATT vs LITP Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs LITP
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$9.36
Change+$0.27 (+2.97%)
Volume$200
Net Assets60.13M
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$5.78
Change+$0.30 (+5.47%)
Volume$100
Net Assets13M
BATT vs LITP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. LITP commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Buy and LITP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 60.1M vs. LITP (13M). BATT has a higher annual dividend yield than LITP: BATT (3.295) vs LITP (-17.964). BATT was incepted earlier than LITP: BATT (7 years) vs LITP (2 years). BATT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than LITP (0.65). BATT has a higher turnover LITP (49.00) vs LITP (49.00).
| BATT | LITP | BATT / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | 3.295 | -17.964 | -18% |
| Net Assets | 60.1M | 13M | 462% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.65 | 91% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 49.00 | 141% |
| Yield | 3.21 | 8.46 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | -0.72% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 72% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| PLL - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||