Ad is loading...
BATT vs LITP
BATT vs LITP Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs LITP
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$9.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$46.44K
CapitalizationN/A
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$8.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$20.98K
CapitalizationN/A
BATT vs LITP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. LITP commentary
Nov 13, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and LITP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 76.5M vs. LITP (7.49M). BATT has a higher annual dividend yield than LITP: BATT (-11.300) vs LITP (-31.517). BATT was incepted earlier than LITP: BATT (6 years) vs LITP (2 years). LITP has a higher turnover BATT (42.00) vs BATT (42.00).
| BATT | LITP | BATT / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | -11.300 | -31.517 | 36% |
| Net Assets | 76.5M | 7.49M | 1,021% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 59.00 | 71% |
| Yield | 3.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 90% | 12 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 88% | 14 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -1.90% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | -3.04% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | +6.63% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.74% | ||
| NIO - BATT | 63% Loosely correlated | -9.49% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 62% Loosely correlated | -6.96% | ||
More | ||||
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +2.74% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | +4.15% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | +9.57% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +6.11% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | +7.91% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | +7.65% | ||
More | ||||