Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs PIO
BATT vs PIO Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs PIO
BATT vs PIO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. PIO commentary
Jul 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and PIO is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PIO has more net assets: 271M vs. BATT (115M). PIO has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: PIO (2.447) vs BATT (1.087). BATT was incepted earlier than PIO: BATT (8 years) vs PIO (19 years). BATT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than PIO (0.75). BATT has a higher turnover PIO (45.00) vs PIO (45.00).
| BATT | PIO | BATT / PIO | |
| Gain YTD | 1.087 | 2.447 | 44% |
| Net Assets | 115M | 271M | 42% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.75 | 79% |
| Turnover | 73.00 | 45.00 | 162% |
| Yield | 1.66 | 0.90 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | PIO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | -1.69% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 79% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.60% | ||
| ENS - BATT | 59% Loosely correlated | -3.51% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.79% | ||
| NIU - BATT | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
More | ||||
PIO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIO has been loosely correlated with ACM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PIO jumps, then ACM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PIO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIO | 100% | +1.12% | ||
| ACM - PIO | 64% Loosely correlated | +4.90% | ||
| WTRG - PIO | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.96% | ||
| TTEK - PIO | 51% Loosely correlated | +5.08% | ||
| TTC - PIO | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| ITRI - PIO | 42% Loosely correlated | +26.23% | ||
More | ||||