Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs SETM
BATT vs SETM Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs SETM
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$9.63
Change+$0.12 (+1.26%)
Volume$12.39K
Net Assets64.07M
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
Price$17.89
Change+$0.17 (+0.96%)
Volume$7.33K
Net Assets48.86M
BATT vs SETM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. SETM commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a StrongBuy and SETM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 64.1M vs. SETM (48.9M). SETM has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: SETM (18.713) vs BATT (9.449). BATT was incepted earlier than SETM: BATT (7 years) vs SETM (2 years). BATT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than SETM (0.65). BATT has a higher turnover SETM (37.00) vs SETM (37.00).
| BATT | SETM | BATT / SETM | |
| Gain YTD | 9.449 | 18.713 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 64.1M | 48.9M | 131% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.65 | 91% |
| Turnover | 69.00 | 37.00 | 186% |
| Yield | 2.98 | 1.79 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +1.28% | ||
| FCX - BATT | 76% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| HBM - BATT | 70% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | +7.90% | ||
More | ||||
SETM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SETM has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SETM jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SETM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SETM | 100% | +0.96% | ||
| FCX - SETM | 76% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| HBM - SETM | 73% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| SCCO - SETM | 72% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| MP - SETM | 68% Closely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| ERO - SETM | 68% Closely correlated | -2.81% | ||
More | ||||