Ad is loading...
BATT vs SETM
BATT vs SETM Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs SETM
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$7.40
Change-$0.11 (-1.46%)
Volume$335
Net Assets47.37M
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
Price$12.64
Change-$0.46 (-3.51%)
Volume$100
Net Assets29.63M
BATT vs SETM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. SETM commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and SETM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 47.4M vs. SETM (29.6M). SETM has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: SETM (-13.072) vs BATT (-14.659). BATT was incepted earlier than SETM: BATT (7 years) vs SETM (2 years). BATT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than SETM (0.65). BATT has a higher turnover SETM (33.00) vs SETM (33.00).
| BATT | SETM | BATT / SETM | |
| Gain YTD | -14.659 | -13.072 | 112% |
| Net Assets | 47.4M | 29.6M | 160% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.65 | 91% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 33.00 | 127% |
| Yield | 3.34 | 2.20 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 89% | 23 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +9.00% | ||
| FCX - BATT | 73% Closely correlated | +15.51% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +12.31% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 68% Closely correlated | +17.08% | ||
| HBM - BATT | 68% Closely correlated | +14.12% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | +10.49% | ||
More | ||||
SETM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SETM has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SETM jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SETM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SETM | 100% | +12.35% | ||
| FCX - SETM | 76% Closely correlated | +15.51% | ||
| HBM - SETM | 73% Closely correlated | +14.12% | ||
| SCCO - SETM | 72% Closely correlated | +11.62% | ||
| MP - SETM | 68% Closely correlated | +8.52% | ||
| ERO - SETM | 68% Closely correlated | +10.67% | ||
More | ||||