Ad is loading...
BATT vs SETM
BATT vs SETM Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs SETM
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$9.11
Change+$0.12 (+1.33%)
Volume$161
CapitalizationN/A
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
Price$15.21
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
Volume$45.89K
CapitalizationN/A
BATT vs SETM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. SETM commentary
Dec 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and SETM is a Sell.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 68M vs. SETM (31M). SETM has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: SETM (-12.466) vs BATT (-13.577). BATT was incepted earlier than SETM: BATT (7 years) vs SETM (2 years). BATT has a higher turnover SETM (33.00) vs SETM (33.00).
| BATT | SETM | BATT / SETM | |
| Gain YTD | -13.577 | -12.466 | 109% |
| Net Assets | 68M | 31M | 219% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 33.00 | 127% |
| Yield | 3.61 | 2.47 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 90% | 24 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +1.33% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -2.40% | ||
| NIO - BATT | 65% Loosely correlated | +3.18% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| XPEV - BATT | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
More | ||||
SETM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SETM has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SETM jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SETM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SETM | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| FCX - SETM | 76% Closely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| HBM - SETM | 73% Closely correlated | +4.17% | ||
| SCCO - SETM | 72% Closely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| MP - SETM | 68% Closely correlated | -2.10% | ||
| ERO - SETM | 68% Closely correlated | +1.77% | ||
More | ||||