Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BATT vs SETM
BATT vs SETM Comparison
Open Charts BATT vs SETM
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$8.71
Change+$0.09 (+1.04%)
Volume$16.41K
Net Assets55.69M
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
Price$15.33
Change+$0.24 (+1.59%)
Volume$23.88K
Net Assets38.36M
BATT vs SETM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BATT vs. SETM commentary
Jun 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and SETM is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 55.7M vs. SETM (38.4M). SETM has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: SETM (1.725) vs BATT (-1.023). BATT was incepted earlier than SETM: BATT (7 years) vs SETM (2 years). BATT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than SETM (0.65). BATT has a higher turnover SETM (37.00) vs SETM (37.00).
| BATT | SETM | BATT / SETM | |
| Gain YTD | -1.023 | 1.725 | -59% |
| Net Assets | 55.7M | 38.4M | 145% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.65 | 91% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 37.00 | 114% |
| Yield | 3.21 | 2.08 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BATT | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +0.99% | ||
| FCX - BATT | 75% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| HBM - BATT | 70% Closely correlated | +2.30% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 69% Closely correlated | +2.63% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | +3.33% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | +7.97% | ||
More | ||||
SETM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SETM has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SETM jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SETM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SETM | 100% | +1.59% | ||
| FCX - SETM | 76% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| HBM - SETM | 73% Closely correlated | +2.30% | ||
| SCCO - SETM | 72% Closely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| MP - SETM | 68% Closely correlated | +7.32% | ||
| ERO - SETM | 68% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
More | ||||