BATT
Price
$15.54
Change
-$0.16 (-1.02%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
123.47M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SETM
Price
$33.96
Change
-$0.33 (-0.96%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
619.45M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BATT vs SETM

BATT vs SETM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) vs. Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM)

Key Takeaways

  • BATT targets the lithium battery technology supply chain, including battery metals, storage solutions, and electric vehicles, while SETM provides broader exposure to critical materials essential for the energy transition, such as uranium, copper, lithium, and rare earths.
  • BATT holds approximately 55 securities and follows a rules-based index focused on companies deriving significant revenue from lithium battery technology, whereas SETM tracks an index of 100–120 holdings emphasizing pure-play energy transition materials companies.
  • Both ETFs maintain similar expense ratios, with BATT at 0.59% and SETM at 0.65%, reflecting their specialized thematic mandates.
  • BATT exhibits concentrated exposure to battery producers and automakers, while SETM offers greater diversification across mining and materials subsectors, resulting in differing risk profiles tied to commodity cycles.
  • Structural differences position BATT for investors seeking EV and battery-specific themes and SETM for those pursuing wider critical minerals exposure amid global electrification trends.
  • Neither fund employs leverage or inverse strategies; both are passively managed, physically replicated ETFs with annual or semi-annual rebalancing depending on their underlying indices.

Introduction

Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) and Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM) both provide targeted equity exposure to materials and technologies supporting the global shift toward electrification and cleaner energy. These ETFs do not compete directly but offer complementary strategies within the critical materials and energy transition space. BATT narrows focus to the lithium battery ecosystem, while SETM spans a wider array of minerals and metals required for energy generation, transmission, and storage. Investors comparing the two gain insight into varying degrees of thematic concentration and sector breadth.

Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) Overview

BATT seeks to track the EQM Lithium & Battery Technology Index. The fund invests at least 80% of its assets in securities of companies involved in the development, production, and use of lithium battery technology, encompassing battery storage, battery metals and materials, and electric vehicles. It holds approximately 55 securities and is non-diversified. Top holdings typically include Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd, BHP Group Ltd, Tesla Inc, BYD Co Ltd, and Freeport-McMoRan Inc. Sector allocations concentrate in materials, industrials, and consumer discretionary, with notable exposure to lithium, nickel, and related supply-chain participants. The expense ratio stands at 0.59%. BATT employs a passive, rules-based approach with periodic index rebalancing.

Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM) Overview

SETM seeks to track the Nasdaq Sprott Critical Materials Index. The fund targets companies deriving at least 50% of revenue or assets from mining, exploration, production, recycling, or related activities involving energy transition materials, including uranium, copper, lithium, nickel, cobalt, graphite, manganese, rare earths, and silver. It typically holds 100–120 securities. Prominent holdings often feature NAC Kazatomprom JSC, Freeport-McMoRan Inc, Cameco Corp, Albemarle Corp, and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. Allocations span metals and mining subsectors with global developed and emerging market exposure. The expense ratio is 0.65%. SETM follows a passive, market-cap-weighted methodology with semi-annual index rebalancing.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The critical materials sector benefits from rising global electricity demand, technological advancements in energy storage, and policy support for decarbonization. Macro drivers include expanding electric vehicle adoption, renewable energy infrastructure buildout, and supply-chain diversification efforts amid geopolitical considerations. Both ETFs face risks associated with commodity price volatility, regulatory changes in mining jurisdictions, and shifts in capital expenditure by major producers. Capital flows into energy transition themes have remained steady across recent market cycles, supporting long-term structural demand for the underlying holdings.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, BATT has shown sensitivity to battery metal price movements and electric vehicle production trends, with performance influenced by earnings from key holdings in lithium and automotive sectors. SETM has reflected broader commodity cycles, including uranium and copper dynamics, leading to differentiated volatility relative to BATT. Relative positioning highlights BATT’s deeper tie to downstream battery and EV applications versus SETM’s upstream mining emphasis. Both funds exhibit elevated volatility compared with broad equity benchmarks due to their thematic concentration, with performance drivers tied to interest rate expectations, global manufacturing activity, and mineral supply constraints over multi-month periods.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favor to SETM. Its broader diversification across critical materials, larger number of holdings, and balanced exposure to multiple energy transition subsectors provide a more resilient profile amid evolving commodity and policy environments compared with BATT’s narrower lithium-battery focus.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BATT vs. SETM commentary
Sep 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATT is a Hold and SETM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SETM has more net assets: 619M vs. BATT (123M). SETM has a higher annual dividend yield than BATT: SETM (17.306) vs BATT (12.576). BATT was incepted earlier than SETM: BATT (8 years) vs SETM (4 years). BATT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than SETM (0.65). BATT has a higher turnover SETM (55.00) vs SETM (55.00).
BATTSETMBATT / SETM
Gain YTD12.57617.30673%
Net Assets123M619M20%
Total Expense Ratio0.590.6591%
Turnover73.0055.00133%
Yield1.611.31122%
Fund Existence8 years4 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BATTSETM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BATT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SETM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WSCOX18.680.08
+0.43%
Allspring Disciplined Small Cap Inst
EITEX55.470.20
+0.36%
Parametric Tax-Managed Emerg Mkt I
FCSDX19.61-0.05
-0.25%
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc C
MUIGX20.24-0.08
-0.39%
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Core R6
REPSX40.37-0.48
-1.18%
ProFunds Real Estate UltraSector Svc

BATT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BATT
1D Price
Change %
BATT100%
-1.05%
BHP - BATT
79%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
ALB - BATT
59%
Loosely correlated
-4.45%
SQM - BATT
58%
Loosely correlated
-4.20%
NIU - BATT
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.01%
ENS - BATT
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
More