Ad is loading...
BAWAX vs GFACX
BAWAX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BAWAX vs GFACX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Adv
Price$55.22
Change+$0.68 (+1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.15B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$67.12
Change+$0.47 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets310.06B
BAWAX vs GFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAWAX vs. GFACX commentary
Jan 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAWAX is a Buy and GFACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 310B vs. BAWAX (10.2B). BAWAX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . BAWAX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BAWAX (13 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. BAWAX (13.00). BAWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: BAWAX (100) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.05 vs. BAWAX (17.19). BAWAX return over 5 years is better than : 94.03 vs. GFACX (39.72).
| BAWAX | GFACX | BAWAX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.988 | 5.270 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.2B | 310B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.19 | 20.05 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.55 | 15.88 | 230% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.03 | 39.72 | 237% |
| Returns for 10 years | 280.30 | 65.28 | 429% |