Ad is loading...
BAWAX vs GFACX
BAWAX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BAWAX vs GFACX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Adv
Price$46.20
Change+$4.68 (+11.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.23B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$58.83
Change+$5.60 (+10.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets245.76B
BAWAX vs GFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAWAX vs. GFACX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAWAX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 246B vs. BAWAX (7.23B). BAWAX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . BAWAX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BAWAX (13 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than BAWAX (1.01). BAWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). BAWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: BAWAX (100) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.80 vs. BAWAX (-17.85). BAWAX return over 5 years is better than : 61.12 vs. GFACX (27.34).
| BAWAX | GFACX | BAWAX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.36 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.36 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -20.307 | -16.515 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.23B | 246B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.85 | -13.80 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.64 | -7.38 | -22% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.12 | 27.34 | 224% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.35 | 25.16 | 665% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...