Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAWAX vs GFACX
BAWAX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BAWAX vs GFACX
BAWAX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAWAX vs. GFACX commentary
Jun 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAWAX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. BAWAX (4.21B). BAWAX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . BAWAX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BAWAX (14 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than BAWAX (1.00). BAWAX (32.00) and GFACX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. BAWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: BAWAX (100) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.62 vs. BAWAX (-20.74). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 6.12 vs. BAWAX (0.84).
| BAWAX | GFACX | BAWAX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.35 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.35 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.241 | 6.389 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.21B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.74 | 2.62 | -791% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.23 | 34.01 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.84 | 6.12 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 173.09 | 83.64 | 207% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement