Ad is loading...
BAWAX vs GFAFX
BAWAX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts BAWAX vs GFAFX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Adv
Price$46.20
Change+$4.68 (+11.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.23B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$68.18
Change+$6.48 (+10.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets271.59B
BAWAX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAWAX vs. GFAFX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAWAX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 272B vs. BAWAX (7.23B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than BAWAX: GFAFX (0.35) vs BAWAX (0.00). BAWAX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: BAWAX (13 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). BAWAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). BAWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). BAWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: BAWAX (100) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.13 vs. BAWAX (-17.85). BAWAX return over 5 years is better than : 61.12 vs. GFAFX (36.47).
| BAWAX | GFAFX | BAWAX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.67 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.67 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -20.307 | -16.350 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.23B | 272B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.35 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.85 | -12.13 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.64 | -3.17 | -52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.12 | 36.47 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.35 | 39.06 | 428% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...