Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAWAX vs GFAFX
BAWAX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts BAWAX vs GFAFX
BAWAX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAWAX vs. GFAFX commentary
Jun 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAWAX is a Hold and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. BAWAX (4.21B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than BAWAX: GFAFX (0.20) vs BAWAX (0.00). BAWAX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: BAWAX (14 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). BAWAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). BAWAX (32.00) and GFAFX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. BAWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: BAWAX (100) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.17 vs. BAWAX (-20.74). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.49 vs. BAWAX (0.84).
| BAWAX | GFAFX | BAWAX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.65 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.65 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.241 | 6.745 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.21B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.74 | 5.17 | -401% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.23 | 42.25 | 12% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.84 | 15.49 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 173.09 | 107.76 | 161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers