Ad is loading...
BAWAX vs RGACX
BAWAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BAWAX vs RGACX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Adv
Price$49.29
Change+$0.09 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.44B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$70.07
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
BAWAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAWAX vs. RGACX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAWAX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. BAWAX (8.44B). RGACX pays higher dividends than BAWAX: RGACX (0.08) vs BAWAX (0.00). BAWAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BAWAX (13 years) vs RGACX (23 years). BAWAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). BAWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). BAWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: BAWAX (100) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.58 vs. BAWAX (-0.69). BAWAX return over 5 years is better than : 74.73 vs. RGACX (41.87).
| BAWAX | RGACX | BAWAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.94 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.94 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.393 | -2.667 | 202% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.44B | 285B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.69 | 2.58 | -27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.97 | 31.70 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.73 | 41.87 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 217.59 | 58.36 | 373% |