Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAWAX vs RGACX
BAWAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BAWAX vs RGACX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Adv
Price$53.42
Change+$0.54 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.3B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.71
Change+$0.94 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.08B
BAWAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAWAX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAWAX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 335B vs. BAWAX (7.3B). RGACX pays higher dividends than BAWAX: RGACX (0.07) vs BAWAX (0.00). BAWAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BAWAX (13 years) vs RGACX (24 years). BAWAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). BAWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). BAWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: BAWAX (100) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.92 vs. BAWAX (-4.62). BAWAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.87 vs. RGACX (31.27).
| BAWAX | RGACX | BAWAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.94 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.94 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.497 | 17.669 | 8% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.3B | 335B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.62 | 6.92 | -67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.21 | 62.41 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.87 | 31.27 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 218.17 | 88.68 | 246% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement