Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAWAX vs RGACX
BAWAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BAWAX vs RGACX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Adv
Price$54.31
Change+$0.19 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.38B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.62
Change+$0.46 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
BAWAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAWAX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAWAX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. BAWAX (8.38B). RGACX pays higher dividends than BAWAX: RGACX (0.07) vs BAWAX (0.00). BAWAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BAWAX (13 years) vs RGACX (23 years). BAWAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). BAWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). BAWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: BAWAX (100) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.39 vs. BAWAX (7.61). BAWAX return over 5 years is better than : 61.54 vs. RGACX (41.73).
| BAWAX | RGACX | BAWAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.94 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.94 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.436 | 15.516 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.38B | 332B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.61 | 20.39 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.28 | 50.71 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.54 | 41.73 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 244.79 | 96.02 | 255% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement