Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAWAX vs RGACX
BAWAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BAWAX vs RGACX
BAWAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAWAX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAWAX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. BAWAX (4.21B). BAWAX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . BAWAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BAWAX (14 years) vs RGACX (24 years). BAWAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). BAWAX (32.00) and RGACX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. BAWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: BAWAX (100) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. BAWAX (-20.74). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.23 vs. BAWAX (0.84).
| BAWAX | RGACX | BAWAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.93 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.93 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.241 | 6.585 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.21B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.74 | 4.59 | -452% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.23 | 40.19 | 13% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.84 | 13.23 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 173.09 | 102.77 | 168% |