Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAWAX vs RGACX
BAWAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BAWAX vs RGACX
BAWAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAWAX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAWAX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. BAWAX (4.59B). BAWAX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . BAWAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BAWAX (14 years) vs RGACX (24 years). BAWAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). BAWAX (32.00) and RGACX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. BAWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: BAWAX (100) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.24 vs. BAWAX (-12.03). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 22.53 vs. BAWAX (16.45).
| BAWAX | RGACX | BAWAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.93 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.93 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.073 | 10.291 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.59B | 338B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.03 | 14.24 | -84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.82 | 51.07 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.45 | 22.53 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 186.65 | 107.79 | 173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers