Analysis and predictions BBAR vs CIVB
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBAR is a Hold and CIVB is a StrongSell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BBAR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCIVB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BBAR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- CIVB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BBAR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CIVB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BBAR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- CIVB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BBAR (@Regional Banks) experienced а +13.41% price change this week, while CIVB (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.43%.
Reported Earning Dates
BBAR is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2024.
CIVB is expected to report earnings on Jul 26, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+1.20% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| BBAR | CIVB | BBAR / CIVB | |
| Capitalization | 2.2B | 241M | 911% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 94.278 | -22.105 | -427% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.60 | 5.47 | 542% |
| Revenue | 646B | 160M | 403,750% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 454M | - |
BBAR | CIVB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 24 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 38 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 46 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CIVB's Valuation (19) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BBAR (57) in the null industry. This means that CIVB’s stock grew somewhat faster than BBAR’s over the last 12 months.
BBAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIVB (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BBAR’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIVB’s over the last 12 months.
BBAR's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CIVB (24) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BBAR’s stock grew similarly to CIVB’s over the last 12 months.
BBAR's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CIVB (61) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BBAR’s stock grew similarly to CIVB’s over the last 12 months.
BBAR's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIVB (38) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BBAR’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIVB’s over the last 12 months.
| BBAR | CIVB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 13 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 65% |
BBAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBAR has been closely correlated with GGAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBAR jumps, then GGAL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBAR | 100% | +9.27% | ||
| GGAL - BBAR | 89% Closely correlated | +7.62% | ||
| BMA - BBAR | 87% Closely correlated | +7.32% | ||
| SUPV - BBAR | 85% Closely correlated | +5.53% | ||
| SBNY - BBAR | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| VBNK - BBAR | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
More | ||||
CIVB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIVB has been closely correlated with MOFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIVB jumps, then MOFG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIVB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIVB | 100% | -0.35% | ||
| MOFG - CIVB | 72% Closely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| CCNE - CIVB | 71% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| PFS - CIVB | 70% Closely correlated | +2.30% | ||
| LBAI - CIVB | 70% Closely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| UBSI - CIVB | 70% Closely correlated | +0.41% | ||
More | ||||