Advertisement
BBAR vs BMA
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Banco BBVA Argentina S.A. (BBAR) vs. Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Banco BBVA Argentina S.A. (BBAR) and Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) are leading Argentine commercial banks with exposure to retail and corporate lending in a recovering economy.
- Both stocks have experienced volatility in recent weeks amid broader market movements and sector-specific developments such as dividend approvals and earnings releases.
- BMA maintains a larger market capitalization compared to BBAR, reflecting differences in scale and asset base.
- Recent market activity shows both names reacting to Argentine economic indicators, regulatory updates, and quarterly financial reporting.
- Relative performance has varied, with neither stock demonstrating consistent outperformance over short-term windows in the current environment.
- Key contrasts include differences in capital allocation strategies, loan growth trajectories, and non-performing loan (NPL) management.
Introduction
Banco BBVA Argentina S.A. (BBAR) and Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) represent two prominent players in Argentina’s banking sector, offering investors exposure to financial services in an emerging market. This comparison examines their business profiles, recent price behavior, and key operational metrics to assist traders and investors evaluating relative positioning. The analysis targets those seeking insights into sector dynamics, including momentum, risk factors, and market sentiment, without favoring one name over the other.
BBAR Overview and Recent Performance
Banco BBVA Argentina S.A. (BBAR) operates as a full-service bank focused on retail banking, corporate lending, and wealth management in Argentina. In recent market activity, the stock has shown notable price swings influenced by quarterly earnings releases, dividend distribution approvals, and broader economic sentiment. Developments such as Central Bank approvals for profit payouts and the filing of annual reports have contributed to shifts in investor focus. Loan growth targets and provisions for credit quality have remained central themes shaping performance narratives over recent weeks.
BMA Overview and Recent Performance
Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) functions as a major commercial bank emphasizing corporate and retail services across Argentina. Recent performance has reflected reactions to dividend installment announcements, share buyback programs, and fiscal year reporting. Market movements in recent weeks have been shaped by similar macroeconomic factors as peers, including regulatory developments and earnings-related updates. The stock has navigated periods of both gains and pullbacks amid sector-wide volatility.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page highlights a curated selection of AI trading bots from a much larger pool of hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance profiles, with only the most suitable for prevailing market conditions featured in the trending section. Available bots display a range of statistics, including win rates, average returns, and drawdown metrics that can span from conservative low-volatility approaches to higher-frequency tactical styles. This resource provides traders with data-driven options tailored to diverse market environments. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page.
Head-to-Head Comparison
In business model terms, both entities focus on traditional banking activities, yet BMA operates with a larger overall scale as evidenced by its higher market capitalization. Growth drivers include loan expansion in Argentina’s private sector, though each bank manages differing exposure to credit cycles and net interest margins. Recent momentum has been mixed for both, with price action tied to dividend news and earnings figures rather than clear directional trends. Risk factors encompass currency fluctuations, regulatory changes, and non-performing loan ratios, with BMA potentially benefiting from greater liquidity buffers in certain metrics. Sector exposure remains aligned within Argentine financials, while market sentiment reflects broader caution toward emerging-market banks amid economic policy shifts. Trade-offs center on BMA’s size advantage versus BBAR’s potentially more agile positioning in specific segments.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, stability indicators, and relative positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic preference toward BMA. This stems from its larger scale and certain technical signals appearing more constructive in short-term evaluations, though outcomes remain subject to ongoing volatility and sector developments.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBAR is a Hold and BMA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BBAR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBMA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- BBAR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- BMA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BBAR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BMA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BBAR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- BMA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BBAR (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.45% price change this week, while BMA (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.89%.
Reported Earning Dates
BBAR is expected to report earnings on Aug 24, 2026.
BMA is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+0.72% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| BBAR | BMA | BBAR / BMA | |
| Capitalization | 4.43B | 6.39B | 69% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.775 | 11.491 | 155% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.93 | 24.62 | 81% |
| Revenue | 3.3T | 4.71T | 70% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 1.48T | - |
BBAR | BMA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 43 | 42 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 41 | 41 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BMA's Valuation (21) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BBAR (67) in the null industry. This means that BMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than BBAR’s over the last 12 months.
BMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BBAR (41) in the null industry. This means that BMA’s stock grew similarly to BBAR’s over the last 12 months.
BMA's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BBAR (1) in the null industry. This means that BMA’s stock grew similarly to BBAR’s over the last 12 months.
BMA's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BBAR (37) in the null industry. This means that BMA’s stock grew similarly to BBAR’s over the last 12 months.
BMA's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BBAR (10) in the null industry. This means that BMA’s stock grew similarly to BBAR’s over the last 12 months.
| BBAR | BMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 81% | 16 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| YINN | 25.84 | 0.28 | +1.10% |
| Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X ETF | |||
| YSEP | 27.61 | 0.02 | +0.09% |
| FT Vest Intl Eq Mod Bfr ETF Sep | |||
| QCLR | 28.89 | N/A | N/A |
| Global X NASDAQ 100® Collar 95-110 ETF | |||
| IVSI | 28.81 | N/A | N/A |
| Applied Finance IVS International Large ETF | |||
| JGRO | 96.95 | -0.61 | -0.63% |
| JPMorgan Active Growth ETF | |||
BBAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBAR has been closely correlated with BMA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBAR jumps, then BMA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBAR | 100% | -4.16% | ||
| BMA - BBAR | 94% Closely correlated | -4.33% | ||
| SUPV - BBAR | 93% Closely correlated | -9.31% | ||
| GGAL - BBAR | 93% Closely correlated | -5.35% | ||
| BSAC - BBAR | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| BSBR - BBAR | 39% Loosely correlated | +2.12% | ||
More | ||||
BMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMA has been closely correlated with GGAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BMA jumps, then GGAL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMA | 100% | -4.33% | ||
| GGAL - BMA | 95% Closely correlated | -5.35% | ||
| BBAR - BMA | 94% Closely correlated | -4.16% | ||
| SUPV - BMA | 93% Closely correlated | -9.31% | ||
| BSAC - BMA | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| BCH - BMA | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
More | ||||