Ad is loading...
BBCA vs EDEN
BBCA vs EDEN Comparison
Open Charts BBCA vs EDEN
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF
Price$69.51
Change+$4.09 (+6.25%)
Volume$1.32K
Net Assets6.9B
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
Price$93.26
Change-$0.63 (-0.67%)
Volume$4.05K
Net Assets191.83M
BBCA vs EDEN Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBCA vs. EDEN commentary
Apr 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBCA is a Hold and EDEN is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BBCA has more net assets: 6.9B vs. EDEN (192M). BBCA has a higher annual dividend yield than EDEN: BBCA (-7.050) vs EDEN (-12.329). BBCA was incepted earlier than EDEN: BBCA (7 years) vs EDEN (13 years). BBCA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than EDEN (0.53). EDEN has a higher turnover BBCA (3.00) vs BBCA (3.00).
| BBCA | EDEN | BBCA / EDEN | |
| Gain YTD | -7.050 | -12.329 | 57% |
| Net Assets | 6.9B | 192M | 3,593% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.53 | 36% |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 14.00 | 21% |
| Yield | 2.30 | 1.54 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BBCA | EDEN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 86% | 23 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EDEN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EDEN has been loosely correlated with GMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EDEN jumps, then GMAB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EDEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDEN | 100% | -0.67% | ||
| GMAB - EDEN | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| TOP - EDEN | 19% Poorly correlated | -3.70% | ||
| FLS - EDEN | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.23% | ||
| STG - EDEN | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.10% | ||
| SIM - EDEN | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||