Ad is loading...
BBCA vs EDEN
BBCA vs EDEN Comparison
Open Charts BBCA vs EDEN
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF
Price$74.92
Change-$0.13 (-0.17%)
Volume$101
Net Assets7.84B
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
Price$108.39
Change+$1.05 (+0.98%)
Volume$150
Net Assets221.5M
BBCA vs EDEN Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBCA vs. EDEN commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBCA is a Buy and EDEN is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BBCA has more net assets: 7.84B vs. EDEN (221M). BBCA has a higher annual dividend yield than EDEN: BBCA (6.646) vs EDEN (0.907). BBCA was incepted earlier than EDEN: BBCA (7 years) vs EDEN (13 years). BBCA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than EDEN (0.53). EDEN has a higher turnover BBCA (3.00) vs BBCA (3.00).
| BBCA | EDEN | BBCA / EDEN | |
| Gain YTD | 6.646 | 0.907 | 732% |
| Net Assets | 7.84B | 221M | 3,548% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.53 | 36% |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 14.00 | 21% |
| Yield | 2.21 | 1.48 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BBCA | EDEN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 10 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BBCA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBCA has been closely correlated with RY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBCA jumps, then RY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBCA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBCA | 100% | -0.24% | ||
| RY - BBCA | 80% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| BN - BBCA | 80% Closely correlated | +3.08% | ||
| BNS - BBCA | 73% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| BAM - BBCA | 73% Closely correlated | +1.90% | ||
| CM - BBCA | 73% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
More | ||||
EDEN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EDEN has been loosely correlated with GMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EDEN jumps, then GMAB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EDEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDEN | 100% | -0.87% | ||
| GMAB - EDEN | 50% Loosely correlated | -5.73% | ||
| TOP - EDEN | 17% Poorly correlated | +2.63% | ||
| FLS - EDEN | 12% Poorly correlated | +2.61% | ||
| STG - EDEN | 4% Poorly correlated | +2.49% | ||
| SIM - EDEN | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||