| BBCA | EDEN | BBCA / EDEN | |
| Gain YTD | 7.920 | -3.260 | -243% |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 181M | 5,801% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.53 | 36% |
| Turnover | 2.00 | 24.00 | 8% |
| Yield | 1.73 | 2.83 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| BBCA | EDEN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 86% | 13 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 82% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KYN | 13.49 | 0.22 | +1.66% |
| Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund | |||
| ECNS | 29.66 | 0.11 | +0.38% |
| iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | |||
| GVUS | 62.42 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs MktBt Russell LgCpValEqETF | |||
| SHPU | 10.10 | -0.17 | -1.67% |
| Direxion Daily SHOP Bull 2X ETF | |||
| CRWG | 40.32 | -5.26 | -11.54% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBCA has been closely correlated with BMO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBCA jumps, then BMO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBCA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBCA | 100% | +0.02% | ||
| BMO - BBCA | 71% Closely correlated | +1.38% | ||
| RY - BBCA | 69% Closely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| FNV - BBCA | 69% Closely correlated | +0.67% | ||
| WPM - BBCA | 69% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| AEM - BBCA | 69% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EDEN has been loosely correlated with GMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EDEN jumps, then GMAB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EDEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDEN | 100% | +2.17% | ||
| GMAB - EDEN | 33% Loosely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| FLS - EDEN | 19% Poorly correlated | -0.15% | ||
| TOP - EDEN | 6% Poorly correlated | +1.46% | ||
| SIM - EDEN | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CHR - EDEN | 3% Poorly correlated | -5.83% | ||
More | ||||