BBDC
Price
$9.64
Change
-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Updated
Aug 20, 01:21 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.01B
78 days until earnings call
FCFS
Price
$137.96
Change
+$0.33 (+0.24%)
Updated
Aug 20, 01:27 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.11B
64 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BBDC vs FCFS

Header iconBBDC vs FCFS Comparison
Open Charts BBDC vs FCFSBanner chart's image
Barings BDC
Price$9.64
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization1.01B
FirstCash Holdings
Price$137.96
Change+$0.33 (+0.24%)
Volume$100
Capitalization6.11B
BBDC vs FCFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BBDC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BBDC vs. FCFS commentary
Aug 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBDC is a Buy and FCFS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 20, 2025
Stock price -- (BBDC: $9.65 vs. FCFS: $137.63)
Brand notoriety: BBDC and FCFS are both not notable
BBDC represents the Investment Managers, while FCFS is part of the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBDC: 86% vs. FCFS: 48%
Market capitalization -- BBDC: $1.01B vs. FCFS: $6.11B
BBDC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.01B. FCFS’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $6.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $174.75B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $664.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.6B. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBDC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFCFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BBDC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FCFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BBDC is a better buy in the long-term than FCFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBDC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCFS’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BBDC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FCFS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCFS is a better buy in the short-term than BBDC.

Price Growth

BBDC (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.21% price change this week, while FCFS (@Savings Banks) price change was -0.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.31%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -2.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

BBDC is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

FCFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.75% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

@Savings Banks (-2.29% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCFS($6.11B) has a higher market cap than BBDC($1.02B). FCFS has higher P/E ratio than BBDC: FCFS (21.30) vs BBDC (10.16). FCFS YTD gains are higher at: 34.075 vs. BBDC (7.591). FCFS has more cash in the bank: 101M vs. BBDC (93.4M). BBDC has less debt than FCFS: BBDC (1.57B) vs FCFS (2.02B). FCFS has higher revenues than BBDC: FCFS (3.39B) vs BBDC (113M).
BBDCFCFSBBDC / FCFS
Capitalization1.02B6.11B17%
EBITDAN/A969M-
Gain YTD7.59134.07522%
P/E Ratio10.1621.3048%
Revenue113M3.39B3%
Total Cash93.4M101M92%
Total Debt1.57B2.02B78%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BBDC vs FCFS: Fundamental Ratings
BBDC
FCFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8320
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2015
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5347
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4160
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BBDC's Valuation (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FCFS (93) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that BBDC’s stock grew significantly faster than FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

FCFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as BBDC (20) in the null industry. This means that FCFS’s stock grew similarly to BBDC’s over the last 12 months.

FCFS's SMR Rating (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as BBDC (100) in the null industry. This means that FCFS’s stock grew similarly to BBDC’s over the last 12 months.

FCFS's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as BBDC (53) in the null industry. This means that FCFS’s stock grew similarly to BBDC’s over the last 12 months.

BBDC's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as FCFS (60) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that BBDC’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBDCFCFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BBDC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MNVAX29.030.17
+0.59%
Madison Large Cap A
MFOCX32.85N/A
N/A
Marsico Focus
NWHFX15.57N/A
N/A
Nationwide Bailard Cogntv Val M
FDTEX36.06N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock M
CAFAX44.51-0.38
-0.85%
American Funds AMCAP 529A

BBDC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBDC has been closely correlated with BCSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBDC jumps, then BCSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBDC
1D Price
Change %
BBDC100%
-0.31%
BCSF - BBDC
79%
Closely correlated
+1.12%
OBDC - BBDC
75%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
MAIN - BBDC
73%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
HTGC - BBDC
71%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
MFIC - BBDC
70%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
More

FCFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCFS has been loosely correlated with EZPW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCFS jumps, then EZPW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCFS
1D Price
Change %
FCFS100%
-0.59%
EZPW - FCFS
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.50%
UPBD - FCFS
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
BBDC - FCFS
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
ENVA - FCFS
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
COF - FCFS
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
More