BBDC
Price
$9.90
Change
-$0.06 (-0.60%)
Updated
Nov 14, 03:12 PM (EDT)
97 days until earnings call
FCFS
Price
$107.12
Change
-$2.63 (-2.40%)
Updated
Nov 14, 03:19 PM (EDT)
77 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BBDC vs FCFS

Header iconBBDC vs FCFS Comparison
Open Charts BBDC vs FCFSBanner chart's image
Barings BDC
Price$9.90
Change-$0.06 (-0.60%)
Volume$162
CapitalizationN/A
FirstCash Holdings
Price$107.12
Change-$2.63 (-2.40%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
BBDC vs FCFS Comparison Chart
Loading...
BBDC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FCFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BBDC vs. FCFS commentary
Nov 14, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBDC is a Buy and FCFS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2024
Stock price -- (BBDC: $9.96 vs. FCFS: $109.75)
Brand notoriety: BBDC and FCFS are both not notable
BBDC represents the Investment Managers, while FCFS is part of the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBDC: 101% vs. FCFS: 69%
Market capitalization -- BBDC: $979M vs. FCFS: $5.75B
BBDC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $979M. FCFS’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $5.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBDC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFCFS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BBDC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FCFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BBDC is a better buy in the long-term than FCFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBDC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCFS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BBDC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FCFS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCFS is a better buy in the short-term than BBDC.

Price Growth

BBDC (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.84% price change this week, while FCFS (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -0.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.35%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

BBDC is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

FCFS is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.24% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.02% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCFS($5.75B) has a higher market cap than BBDC($979M). FCFS has higher P/E ratio than BBDC: FCFS (26.15) vs BBDC (7.69). BBDC YTD gains are higher at: 25.629 vs. FCFS (2.185). FCFS has more cash in the bank: 127M vs. BBDC (57.2M). BBDC has less debt than FCFS: BBDC (1.44B) vs FCFS (1.92B). FCFS has higher revenues than BBDC: FCFS (3.15B) vs BBDC (140M).
BBDCFCFSBBDC / FCFS
Capitalization979M5.75B17%
EBITDAN/A907M-
Gain YTD25.6292.1851,173%
P/E Ratio7.6926.1529%
Revenue140M3.15B4%
Total Cash57.2M127M45%
Total Debt1.44B1.92B75%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BBDC vs FCFS: Fundamental Ratings
BBDC
FCFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7510
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3052
SMR RATING
1..100
2361
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5261
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7878
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
43n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BBDC's Valuation (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FCFS (98) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that BBDC’s stock grew significantly faster than FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

BBDC's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as FCFS (52) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that BBDC’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

BBDC's SMR Rating (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCFS (61) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that BBDC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

BBDC's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as FCFS (61) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that BBDC’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

BBDC's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as FCFS (78) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that BBDC’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBDCFCFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BBDC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FCFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBMO25.500.01
+0.04%
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bd ETF
FICS34.93-0.12
-0.34%
First Trust Intl Developed Cap Strth ETF
BBLB85.15-0.74
-0.86%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. TrsBd20+YrETF
CGXU25.58-0.24
-0.93%
Capital Group International Focus Eq ETF
KURE15.42-0.26
-1.65%
KraneShares MSCI All China Hlth Care ETF

BBDC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBDC has been closely correlated with OCSL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBDC jumps, then OCSL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBDC
1D Price
Change %
BBDC100%
+2.57%
OCSL - BBDC
69%
Closely correlated
N/A
OBDC - BBDC
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
WD - BBDC
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.09%
ARCC - BBDC
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
SLRC - BBDC
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
More

FCFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCFS has been loosely correlated with UPBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCFS jumps, then UPBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCFS
1D Price
Change %
FCFS100%
+1.69%
UPBD - FCFS
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
EZPW - FCFS
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
COOP - FCFS
39%
Loosely correlated
-3.46%
BBDC - FCFS
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.57%
SLM - FCFS
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
More