Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BBGSX vs FSMAX
BBGSX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BBGSX vs FSMAX
Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Growth
Price$16.70
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.81B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.95
Change+$0.02 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
BBGSX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBGSX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBGSX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. BBGSX (8.81B). BBGSX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: BBGSX (0.56) vs FSMAX (0.46). BBGSX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BBGSX (10 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). BBGSX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). BBGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). BBGSX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.34 vs. BBGSX (17.03). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.31 vs. BBGSX (7.00).
| BBGSX | FSMAX | BBGSX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.04 | 1,029% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.04 | 1,886% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.534 | 4.456 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.81B | 39.6B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.46 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.03 | 20.34 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.65 | 38.69 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.00 | 51.31 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.30 | 84.02 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement