Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BBGSX vs FSMAX
BBGSX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BBGSX vs FSMAX
BBGSX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBGSX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBGSX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. BBGSX (11B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BBGSX: FSMAX (0.50) vs BBGSX (0.11). BBGSX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BBGSX (11 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). BBGSX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). BBGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). BBGSX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. BBGSX (14.58). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. BBGSX (-2.65).
| BBGSX | FSMAX | BBGSX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.04 | 971% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.04 | 1,886% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.418 | 15.427 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 42.7B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.50 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.58 | 29.23 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.68 | 73.83 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.65 | 33.65 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.56 | 153.47 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers