Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BBHLX vs RERAX
BBHLX vs RERAX Comparison
Open Charts BBHLX vs RERAX
BBHLX vs RERAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBHLX vs. RERAX commentary
Jul 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBHLX is a Hold and RERAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 141B vs. BBHLX (2.45B). RERAX pays higher dividends than BBHLX: RERAX (2.25) vs BBHLX (1.03). BBHLX was incepted earlier than RERAX: BBHLX (24 years) vs RERAX (24 years). RERAX (1.57) is less costly to investors than BBHLX (0.63). BBHLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RERAX (50.00). RERAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BBHLX: RERAX (250) vs BBHLX (10000). BBHLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.34 vs. RERAX (1.51). BBHLX return over 5 years is better than : 8.57 vs. RERAX (-9.92).
| BBHLX | RERAX | BBHLX / RERAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.57 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.57 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.962 | 1.194 | 583% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.45B | 141B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 2.25 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.34 | 1.51 | 686% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.18 | 11.37 | 380% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.57 | -9.92 | -86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.62 | 33.27 | 191% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement