Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BBSC vs SMMD
BBSC vs SMMD Comparison
Open Charts BBSC vs SMMD
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Sml Cp Eq ETF
Price$64.65
Change+$0.83 (+1.30%)
Volume$1.62K
Net Assets534.77M
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Price$66.61
Change+$0.85 (+1.29%)
Volume$137
Net Assets1.41B
BBSC vs SMMD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBSC vs. SMMD commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBSC is a Buy and SMMD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMMD has more net assets: 1.41B vs. BBSC (535M). SMMD has a higher annual dividend yield than BBSC: SMMD (-3.004) vs BBSC (-6.149). BBSC was incepted earlier than SMMD: BBSC (5 years) vs SMMD (8 years). BBSC (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than SMMD (0.15). BBSC has a higher turnover SMMD (9.00) vs SMMD (9.00).
| BBSC | SMMD | BBSC / SMMD | |
| Gain YTD | -6.149 | -3.004 | 205% |
| Net Assets | 535M | 1.41B | 38% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.09 | 0.15 | 60% |
| Turnover | 20.00 | 9.00 | 222% |
| Yield | 1.34 | 1.37 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BBSC | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BBSC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBSC has been closely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBSC jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBSC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBSC | 100% | -0.05% | ||
| BCC - BBSC | 69% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| AFRM - BBSC | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.54% | ||
| W - BBSC | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
| SPXC - BBSC | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| CVNA - BBSC | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
More | ||||
SMMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMMD has been loosely correlated with PHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMMD jumps, then PHM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMMD | 100% | -0.09% | ||
| PHM - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| BLDR - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| PTC - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| ENTG - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| HUBB - SMMD | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
More | ||||