Ad is loading...
BBSC vs SMMD
BBSC vs SMMD Comparison
Open Charts BBSC vs SMMD
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Sml Cp Eq ETF
Price$58.63
Change+$0.97 (+1.68%)
Volume$349
Net Assets465.55M
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Price$60.94
Change+$1.26 (+2.11%)
Volume$850
Net Assets1.26B
BBSC vs SMMD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBSC vs. SMMD commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBSC is a StrongBuy and SMMD is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMMD has more net assets: 1.26B vs. BBSC (466M). SMMD has a higher annual dividend yield than BBSC: SMMD (-11.972) vs BBSC (-15.225). BBSC was incepted earlier than SMMD: BBSC (4 years) vs SMMD (8 years). BBSC (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than SMMD (0.15). BBSC has a higher turnover SMMD (9.00) vs SMMD (9.00).
| BBSC | SMMD | BBSC / SMMD | |
| Gain YTD | -15.225 | -11.972 | 127% |
| Net Assets | 466M | 1.26B | 37% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.09 | 0.15 | 60% |
| Turnover | 20.00 | 9.00 | 222% |
| Yield | 1.39 | 1.42 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BBSC | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 83% | 17 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BBSC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBSC has been closely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBSC jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBSC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBSC | 100% | +1.85% | ||
| BCC - BBSC | 69% Closely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| AFRM - BBSC | 63% Loosely correlated | +6.89% | ||
| W - BBSC | 57% Loosely correlated | +3.02% | ||
| SPXC - BBSC | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.97% | ||
| CVNA - BBSC | 52% Loosely correlated | +4.24% | ||
More | ||||
SMMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMMD has been loosely correlated with PHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMMD jumps, then PHM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMMD | 100% | +1.29% | ||
| PHM - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| BLDR - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| PTC - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.70% | ||
| ENTG - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | +4.56% | ||
| HUBB - SMMD | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.59% | ||
More | ||||