Ad is loading...
BBSC vs SMMD
BBSC vs SMMD Comparison
Open Charts BBSC vs SMMD
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Sml Cp Eq ETF
Price$57.37
Change-$4.17 (-6.78%)
Volume$132
Net Assets497.59M
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Price$59.57
Change-$4.18 (-6.56%)
Volume$3.73K
Net Assets1.29B
BBSC vs SMMD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BBSC vs. SMMD commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBSC is a Hold and SMMD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMMD has more net assets: 1.29B vs. BBSC (498M). SMMD has a higher annual dividend yield than BBSC: SMMD (-5.969) vs BBSC (-9.491). BBSC was incepted earlier than SMMD: BBSC (4 years) vs SMMD (8 years). BBSC (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than SMMD (0.15). BBSC has a higher turnover SMMD (9.00) vs SMMD (9.00).
| BBSC | SMMD | BBSC / SMMD | |
| Gain YTD | -9.491 | -5.969 | 159% |
| Net Assets | 498M | 1.29B | 38% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.09 | 0.15 | 60% |
| Turnover | 20.00 | 9.00 | 222% |
| Yield | 1.39 | 1.42 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BBSC | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BBSC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBSC has been closely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBSC jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBSC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBSC | 100% | +1.80% | ||
| BCC - BBSC | 69% Closely correlated | +3.19% | ||
| AFRM - BBSC | 63% Loosely correlated | +4.92% | ||
| W - BBSC | 57% Loosely correlated | +5.57% | ||
| SPXC - BBSC | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.35% | ||
| CVNA - BBSC | 52% Loosely correlated | +6.46% | ||
More | ||||
SMMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMMD has been loosely correlated with PHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMMD jumps, then PHM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMMD | 100% | +1.58% | ||
| PHM - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| BLDR - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | +4.39% | ||
| PTC - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| ENTG - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| HUBB - SMMD | 37% Loosely correlated | +2.63% | ||
More | ||||