BBSEY
Price
$7.00
Change
+$0.20 (+2.94%)
Updated
Feb 28 closing price
Capitalization
13.15B
64 days until earnings call
SLF
Price
$55.86
Change
+$0.31 (+0.56%)
Updated
Mar 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
31.65B
66 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BBSEY vs SLF

Header iconBBSEY vs SLF Comparison
Open Charts BBSEY vs SLFBanner chart's image
BB Seguridade Participacoes SA
Price$7.00
Change+$0.20 (+2.94%)
Volume$24.12K
Capitalization13.15B
Sun Life Financial
Price$55.86
Change+$0.31 (+0.56%)
Volume$3.45K
Capitalization31.65B
BBSEY vs SLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BBSEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BBSEY vs. SLF commentary
Mar 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBSEY is a StrongBuy and SLF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BBSEY: $7.00 vs. SLF: $55.55)
Brand notoriety: BBSEY and SLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBSEY: 32% vs. SLF: 135%
Market capitalization -- BBSEY: $13.15B vs. SLF: $31.65B
BBSEY [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $13.15B. SLF’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $31.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $21.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBSEY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BBSEY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BBSEY is a better buy in the long-term than SLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBSEY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BBSEY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLF is a better buy in the short-term than BBSEY.

Price Growth

BBSEY (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +10.97% price change this week, while SLF (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +1.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

BBSEY is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

SLF is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (+1.10% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLF($31.6B) has a higher market cap than BBSEY($13.1B). SLF has higher P/E ratio than BBSEY: SLF (13.86) vs BBSEY (9.06). BBSEY YTD gains are higher at: 26.662 vs. SLF (-6.387). SLF has more cash in the bank: 27.5B vs. BBSEY (3.51M). SLF has higher revenues than BBSEY: SLF (32.7B) vs BBSEY (4.89B).
BBSEYSLFBBSEY / SLF
Capitalization13.1B31.6B41%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD26.662-6.387-417%
P/E Ratio9.0613.8665%
Revenue4.89B32.7B15%
Total Cash3.51M27.5B0%
Total DebtN/A13.3B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BBSEY vs SLF: Fundamental Ratings
BBSEY
SLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4767
SMR RATING
1..100
1496
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3959
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3939
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLF's Valuation (36) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BBSEY (87) in the null industry. This means that SLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BBSEY’s over the last 12 months.

BBSEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as SLF (67) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that BBSEY’s stock grew similarly to SLF’s over the last 12 months.

BBSEY's SMR Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLF (96) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that BBSEY’s stock grew significantly faster than SLF’s over the last 12 months.

BBSEY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as SLF (59) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that BBSEY’s stock grew similarly to SLF’s over the last 12 months.

BBSEY's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as SLF (39) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that BBSEY’s stock grew similarly to SLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBSEYSLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BBSEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UEC5.600.18
+3.32%
Uranium Energy Corp
EDU48.081.31
+2.80%
New Oriental Education and Technology Group
VFF0.72-0.02
-2.99%
Village Farms International
HAIN3.58-0.12
-3.24%
Hain Celestial Group
ANTE0.49-0.02
-3.33%
AirNet Technology

BBSEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BBSEY and AVVIY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BBSEY and AVVIY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBSEY
1D Price
Change %
BBSEY100%
+9.37%
AVVIY - BBSEY
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
ALIZY - BBSEY
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
AEG - BBSEY
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
SAXPY - BBSEY
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
SLF - BBSEY
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
More

SLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLF has been loosely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLF jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLF
1D Price
Change %
SLF100%
+1.54%
HIG - SLF
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
AVVIY - SLF
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
AXAHY - SLF
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
ALIZY - SLF
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
EQH - SLF
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.64%
More