BCAL
Price
$21.78
Change
+$0.23 (+1.07%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
694.13M
32 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FMBH
Price
$49.98
Change
+$0.70 (+1.42%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.31B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCAL vs FMBH

BCAL vs FMBH Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCAL vs. FMBH commentary
Oct 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCAL is a Hold and FMBH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCAL vs FMBH: Fundamental Ratings
BCAL
FMBH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8170
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3758
SMR RATING
1..100
3223
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4244
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8429
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCAL's Valuation (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMBH (97) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BCAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

BCAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as FMBH (58) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BCAL’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's SMR Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BCAL (32) in the null industry. This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to BCAL’s over the last 12 months.

BCAL's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as FMBH (44) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BCAL’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCAL (84) in the null industry. This means that FMBH’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCAL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCALFMBH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 03, 2026
Stock price -- (BCAL: $21.55 vs. FMBH: $49.28)
Brand notoriety: BCAL and FMBH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCAL: 76% vs. FMBH: 116%
Market capitalization -- BCAL: $694.13M vs. FMBH: $1.31B
BCAL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $694.13M. FMBH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $173.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCAL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while FMBH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BCAL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FMBH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BCAL and FMBH are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCAL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMBH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCAL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FMBH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCAL is a better buy in the short-term than FMBH.

Price Growth

BCAL (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.19% price change this week, while FMBH (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCAL is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.

FMBH is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.68% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
BCAL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FMBH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MTRN285.1415.55
+5.77%
Materion Corp
MERC0.320.01
+3.80%
Mercer International
PD15.580.48
+3.18%
PagerDuty
MCGA10.35N/A
N/A
Yorkville Acquisition Corp.
MAR354.79-0.88
-0.25%
Marriott International

BCAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCAL has been closely correlated with CAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCAL jumps, then CAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCAL
1D Price
Change %
BCAL100%
+0.94%
CAC - BCAL
73%
Closely correlated
+1.94%
CCNE - BCAL
73%
Closely correlated
+1.20%
CNOB - BCAL
72%
Closely correlated
+0.97%
FMBH - BCAL
72%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
SHBI - BCAL
71%
Closely correlated
+1.38%
More

FMBH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMBH has been closely correlated with UVSP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMBH jumps, then UVSP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMBH
1D Price
Change %
FMBH100%
+1.11%
UVSP - FMBH
86%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
BY - FMBH
86%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
IBCP - FMBH
85%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
CCNE - FMBH
85%
Closely correlated
+1.20%
SHBI - FMBH
85%
Closely correlated
+1.38%
More