BCC vs DWAS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCC is a Hold and DWAS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BCC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while.
- BCC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BCC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- BCC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BCC (@Construction Materials) experienced а -6.54% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -3.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.33%.
Reported Earning Dates
BCC is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Construction Materials (-3.73% weekly)Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.
BCC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BCC | DWAS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 81% | 23 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 6 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 88% |
BCC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCC has been closely correlated with EXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCC jumps, then EXP could also see price increases.
DWAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DWAS has been closely correlated with MLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DWAS jumps, then MLI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DWAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DWAS | 100% | -1.20% | ||
| MLI - DWAS | 74% Closely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| MHO - DWAS | 74% Closely correlated | -2.56% | ||
| BCC - DWAS | 74% Closely correlated | -2.30% | ||
| FSS - DWAS | 74% Closely correlated | -1.99% | ||
| PIPR - DWAS | 71% Closely correlated | -2.85% | ||
More | ||||