Advertisement
BCC vs MLM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCC is a Hold and MLM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BCC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMLM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BCC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MLM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BCC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BCC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MLM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
BCC (@Forest Products) experienced а -0.93% price change this week, while MLM (@Construction Materials) price change was -2.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Forest Products industry was +4.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +22.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.90%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.93%.
Reported Earning Dates
BCC is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.
MLM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Forest Products (+4.37% weekly)Forest products are materials derived from forestry for direct consumption or commercial use. Wood, for example, has variety or uses ranging from generating wood fuel (e.g. in the form of firewood or charcoal) to providing structural materials for the construction of buildings and home improvement, or in the form of wood pulp that is used in the paper production. . Pulp and paper industry, in particular, creates high volume demand for the wood materials including both softwood and hardwood. Major companies making such products include Trex Company, Inc. (manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railings), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (makes engineered wood building products) and Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufactures and distributes wood and wood-alternative products, pressure-treated wood, and is a solid-sawn lumber buyer; makes products for use in home improvement and construction industries).
@Construction Materials (-0.92% weekly)Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.
| BCC | MLM | BCC / MLM | |
| Capitalization | 2.88B | 32.1B | 9% |
| EBITDA | 337M | 2.09B | 16% |
| Gain YTD | 12.708 | -13.863 | -92% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.96 | 34.78 | 80% |
| Revenue | 6.37B | 6.69B | 95% |
| Total Cash | 339M | 112M | 303% |
| Total Debt | 540M | 6.35B | 9% |
BCC | MLM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 47 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 82 | 41 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | 41 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BCC's Valuation (17) in the Forest Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLM (76) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that BCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLM’s over the last 12 months.
MLM's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as BCC (70) in the Forest Products industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to BCC’s over the last 12 months.
MLM's SMR Rating (41) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCC (82) in the Forest Products industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCC’s over the last 12 months.
BCC's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Forest Products industry is in the same range as MLM (61) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that BCC’s stock grew similarly to MLM’s over the last 12 months.
BCC's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Forest Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLM (41) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that BCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLM’s over the last 12 months.
| BCC | MLM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 75% | 10 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 65% |
Advertisement
BCC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCC has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCC jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
MLM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLM has been closely correlated with VMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLM jumps, then VMC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLM | 100% | +1.84% | ||
| VMC - MLM | 88% Closely correlated | +1.98% | ||
| CRH - MLM | 72% Closely correlated | +2.13% | ||
| EXP - MLM | 66% Closely correlated | +2.03% | ||
| TTAM - MLM | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| AMRZ - MLM | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.38% | ||
More | ||||