It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BCC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BCC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
BCC (@Construction Materials) experienced а +0.56% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -1.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.05%.
BCC is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.
Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.
BCC | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BCC | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 28 days ago67% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago62% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCC has been closely correlated with EXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCC jumps, then EXP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QVMS has been closely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QVMS jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QVMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QVMS | 100% | -0.95% | ||
BCC - QVMS | 70% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
IBP - QVMS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
MTH - QVMS | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.62% | ||
MLI - QVMS | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.62% | ||
ATI - QVMS | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
More |