Advertisement
IBP vs QVMS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBP is a Hold and QVMS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- IBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IBP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- IBP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
IBP (@Homebuilding) experienced а +4.85% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was +3.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.55%.
Reported Earning Dates
IBP is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Homebuilding (+3.32% weekly)Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.
IBP | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 26 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| IBP | QVMS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 10 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 70% | 14 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 83% |
Advertisement
IBP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBP has been closely correlated with TMHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IBP jumps, then TMHC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IBP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBP | 100% | +1.54% | ||
| TMHC - IBP | 71% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| GRBK - IBP | 69% Closely correlated | +1.64% | ||
| TOL - IBP | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.13% | ||
| PHM - IBP | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| LEN - IBP | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
More | ||||
QVMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QVMS has been closely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QVMS jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QVMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QVMS | 100% | -0.85% | ||
| BCC - QVMS | 70% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| IBP - QVMS | 69% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| MTH - QVMS | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| MLI - QVMS | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| ATI - QVMS | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.48% | ||
More | ||||