Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCEMX vs RNWBX
BCEMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts BCEMX vs RNWBX
BCEMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. BCEMX (141M). BCEMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: BCEMX (1.78) vs RNWBX (0.41). BCEMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: BCEMX (5 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than BCEMX (1.32). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. BCEMX (27.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCEMX: RNWBX (250) vs BCEMX (10000). BCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 57.04 vs. RNWBX (28.07).
| BCEMX | RNWBX | BCEMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.66 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.66 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.601 | 16.252 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 141M | 85.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 0.41 | 430% |
| Returns for 1 year | 57.04 | 28.07 | 203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 91.47 | 51.49 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 14.29 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 111.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement