Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCGDX vs FMDRX
BCGDX vs FMDRX Comparison
Open Charts BCGDX vs FMDRX
BCGDX vs FMDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCGDX vs. FMDRX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCGDX is a Hold and FMDRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMDRX has more cash in the bank: 9.28B vs. BCGDX (96.8M). FMDRX pays higher dividends than BCGDX: FMDRX (1.71) vs BCGDX (1.42). BCGDX was incepted earlier than FMDRX: BCGDX (12 years) vs FMDRX (13 years). BCGDX (1.41) is less costly to investors than FMDRX (0.89). FMDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.28 vs. BCGDX (33.00). BCGDX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMDRX: BCGDX (100000) vs FMDRX (1000000). BCGDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.85 vs. FMDRX (2.41). BCGDX return over 5 years is better than : 59.20 vs. FMDRX (11.47).
| BCGDX | FMDRX | BCGDX / FMDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.89 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 0.89 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.758 | 6.706 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000000 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 96.8M | 9.28B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.71 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.85 | 2.41 | 574% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.18 | 18.27 | 379% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.20 | 11.47 | 516% |
| Returns for 10 years | 158.69 | 25.88 | 613% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement