BCHPY
Price
$5.70
Change
+$0.50 (+9.62%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
288.35M
GFS
Price
$40.33
Change
-$0.12 (-0.30%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
22.38B
16 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCHPY vs GFS

Header iconBCHPY vs GFS Comparison
Open Charts BCHPY vs GFSBanner chart's image
Brainchip Holdings
Price$5.70
Change+$0.50 (+9.62%)
Volume$2.14K
Capitalization288.35M
GlobalFoundries
Price$40.33
Change-$0.12 (-0.30%)
Volume$1.66M
Capitalization22.38B
BCHPY vs GFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCHPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCHPY vs. GFS commentary
Jul 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCHPY is a Hold and GFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 20, 2025
Stock price -- (BCHPY: $5.70 vs. GFS: $40.33)
Brand notoriety: BCHPY and GFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCHPY: 180% vs. GFS: 111%
Market capitalization -- BCHPY: $288.35M vs. GFS: $22.38B
BCHPY [@Semiconductors] is valued at $288.35M. GFS’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $22.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.2T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $62.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCHPY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGFS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BCHPY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GFS is a better buy in the long-term than BCHPY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCHPY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCHPY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCHPY is a better buy in the short-term than GFS.

Price Growth

BCHPY (@Semiconductors) experienced а -1.04% price change this week, while GFS (@Semiconductors) price change was -2.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +1.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCHPY is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.

GFS is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+1.32% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFS($22.4B) has a higher market cap than BCHPY($288M). GFS YTD gains are higher at: -6.013 vs. BCHPY (-41.807). GFS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.47B vs. BCHPY (-23.67M). GFS has more cash in the bank: 2.9B vs. BCHPY (20M). BCHPY has less debt than GFS: BCHPY (1.17M) vs GFS (1.63B). GFS has higher revenues than BCHPY: GFS (6.79B) vs BCHPY (398K).
BCHPYGFSBCHPY / GFS
Capitalization288M22.4B1%
EBITDA-23.67M1.47B-2%
Gain YTD-41.807-6.013695%
P/E RatioN/A28.59-
Revenue398K6.79B0%
Total Cash20M2.9B1%
Total Debt1.17M1.63B0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCHPYGFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCHPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACES28.430.45
+1.61%
ALPS Clean Energy ETF
FDIS96.090.73
+0.77%
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discret ETF
FFEM28.650.05
+0.16%
Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF
MARZ33.10N/A
N/A
TrueShares Structured Outcome March ETF
FXY61.91-0.04
-0.06%
Invesco CurrencyShares® Japanese Yen

BCHPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCHPY has been loosely correlated with BRCHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCHPY jumps, then BRCHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCHPY
1D Price
Change %
BCHPY100%
+9.62%
BRCHF - BCHPY
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
WBTNF - BCHPY
17%
Poorly correlated
-15.38%
CRDO - BCHPY
10%
Poorly correlated
-5.06%
XFABF - BCHPY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GFS - BCHPY
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
More

GFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFS has been closely correlated with ON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GFS jumps, then ON could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFS
1D Price
Change %
GFS100%
-0.30%
ON - GFS
71%
Closely correlated
+2.21%
KLIC - GFS
70%
Closely correlated
-1.34%
LSCC - GFS
70%
Closely correlated
+2.18%
SLAB - GFS
68%
Closely correlated
+2.92%
TXN - GFS
68%
Closely correlated
+0.01%
More