BCHPY vs GFS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCHPY is a Hold and GFS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BCHPY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGFS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BCHPY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GFS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- GFS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
BCHPY (@Semiconductors) experienced а -22.79% price change this week, while GFS (@Semiconductors) price change was -0.05% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.94%.
Reported Earning Dates
BCHPY is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
GFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Semiconductors (+1.03% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| BCHPY | GFS | BCHPY / GFS | |
| Capitalization | 323M | 20.2B | 2% |
| EBITDA | -23.67M | 1.47B | -2% |
| Gain YTD | -46.912 | -15.218 | 308% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 28.59 | - |
| Revenue | 398K | 6.79B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 20M | 2.9B | 1% |
| Total Debt | 1.17M | 1.63B | 0% |
| GFS | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% |
BCHPY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCHPY has been loosely correlated with BRCHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCHPY jumps, then BRCHF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BCHPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCHPY | 100% | N/A | ||
| BRCHF - BCHPY | 48% Loosely correlated | -5.19% | ||
| WBTNF - BCHPY | 17% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CRDO - BCHPY | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.15% | ||
| XFABF - BCHPY | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GFS - BCHPY | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.22% | ||
More | ||||
GFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFS has been closely correlated with ON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GFS jumps, then ON could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFS | 100% | +1.22% | ||
| ON - GFS | 69% Closely correlated | +3.04% | ||
| SLAB - GFS | 67% Closely correlated | +5.38% | ||
| KLIC - GFS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| TXN - GFS | 66% Loosely correlated | +4.00% | ||
| RMBS - GFS | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
More | ||||