BCHPY
Price
$5.35
Change
-$0.12 (-2.19%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
307.3M
GFS
Price
$34.60
Change
+$1.76 (+5.36%)
Updated
Sep 26, 01:10 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.23B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCHPY vs GFS

Header iconBCHPY vs GFS Comparison
Open Charts BCHPY vs GFSBanner chart's image
Brainchip Holdings
Price$5.35
Change-$0.12 (-2.19%)
Volume$14.56K
Capitalization307.3M
GlobalFoundries
Price$34.60
Change+$1.76 (+5.36%)
Volume$4.36K
Capitalization18.23B
BCHPY vs GFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCHPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCHPY vs. GFS commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCHPY is a Hold and GFS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BCHPY: $5.35 vs. GFS: $32.84)
Brand notoriety: BCHPY and GFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCHPY: 283% vs. GFS: 56%
Market capitalization -- BCHPY: $307.3M vs. GFS: $18.23B
BCHPY [@Semiconductors] is valued at $307.3M. GFS’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $18.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.33T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $96.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCHPY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGFS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BCHPY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GFS is a better buy in the long-term than BCHPY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCHPY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCHPY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GFS is a better buy in the short-term than BCHPY.

Price Growth

BCHPY (@Semiconductors) experienced а -2.64% price change this week, while GFS (@Semiconductors) price change was -1.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

GFS is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (-0.01% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFS($18.2B) has a higher market cap than BCHPY($307M). GFS YTD gains are higher at: -23.468 vs. BCHPY (-45.380). GFS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.44B vs. BCHPY (-21.61M). GFS has more cash in the bank: 3.19B vs. BCHPY (20M). BCHPY has less debt than GFS: BCHPY (1.17M) vs GFS (1.68B). GFS has higher revenues than BCHPY: GFS (6.84B) vs BCHPY (1.32M).
BCHPYGFSBCHPY / GFS
Capitalization307M18.2B2%
EBITDA-21.61M1.44B-2%
Gain YTD-45.380-23.468193%
P/E RatioN/A28.59-
Revenue1.32M6.84B0%
Total Cash20M3.19B1%
Total Debt1.17M1.68B0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCHPYGFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCHPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HISF45.06-0.09
-0.21%
First Trust High Income Strat Foc ETF
RSST25.80-0.09
-0.35%
Return Stacked® US Stocks & Mgd Futs ETF
LCTU71.65-0.40
-0.56%
BlackRock US Carbon Transition Rdnss ETF
PFIX47.67-0.63
-1.30%
Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF
MULL31.86-2.08
-6.14%
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF

BCHPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCHPY has been loosely correlated with BRCHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCHPY jumps, then BRCHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCHPY
1D Price
Change %
BCHPY100%
-2.19%
BRCHF - BCHPY
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
WBTNF - BCHPY
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
CRDO - BCHPY
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.97%
XFABF - BCHPY
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
GFS - BCHPY
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
More

GFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFS has been closely correlated with KLIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GFS jumps, then KLIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFS
1D Price
Change %
GFS100%
-0.94%
KLIC - GFS
72%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
FORM - GFS
69%
Closely correlated
-2.01%
SLAB - GFS
69%
Closely correlated
-1.47%
POWI - GFS
68%
Closely correlated
-2.92%
NXPI - GFS
67%
Closely correlated
-0.37%
More