Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCIAX vs FCCQX
BCIAX vs FCCQX Comparison
Open Charts BCIAX vs FCCQX
American Century CA Interm-T T-Fr Bd A
Price$11.26
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
Franklin CA Interm-Term Tx-Fr Inc A
Price$11.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.35B
BCIAX vs FCCQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCIAX vs. FCCQX commentary
Oct 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCIAX is a Hold and FCCQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCIAX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. FCCQX (1.35B). FCCQX pays higher dividends than BCIAX: FCCQX (3.11) vs BCIAX (2.72). BCIAX was incepted earlier than FCCQX: BCIAX (16 years) vs FCCQX (7 years). FCCQX (0.82) is less costly to investors than BCIAX (0.72). BCIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FCCQX (22.85). BCIAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FCCQX (2%) vs FCCQX (2%). FCCQX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCIAX: FCCQX (1000) vs BCIAX (2500). FCCQX (2.54) and BCIAX (2.51) have marching annual gain over last year. BCIAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.08 vs. FCCQX (0.87).
| BCIAX | FCCQX | BCIAX / FCCQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.74 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.82 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.828 | 2.981 | 95% |
| Front Load | 5% | 2% | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 1.35B | 153% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.72 | 3.11 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.51 | 2.54 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.89 | 11.93 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.08 | 0.87 | 470% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement