Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCIAX vs FCCQX
BCIAX vs FCCQX Comparison
Open Charts BCIAX vs FCCQX
BCIAX vs FCCQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCIAX vs. FCCQX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCIAX is a Hold and FCCQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCIAX has more cash in the bank: 2.25B vs. FCCQX (1.41B). FCCQX pays higher dividends than BCIAX: FCCQX (3.28) vs BCIAX (2.79). BCIAX was incepted earlier than FCCQX: BCIAX (16 years) vs FCCQX (8 years). FCCQX (0.81) is less costly to investors than BCIAX (0.72). BCIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FCCQX (22.85). BCIAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FCCQX (2%) vs FCCQX (2%). FCCQX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCIAX: FCCQX (1000) vs BCIAX (2500). BCIAX (5.56) and FCCQX (5.56) have marching annual gain over last year. BCIAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.46 vs. FCCQX (1.41).
| BCIAX | FCCQX | BCIAX / FCCQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.74 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.81 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.081 | 1.186 | 91% |
| Front Load | 5% | 2% | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.25B | 1.41B | 159% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 3.28 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.56 | 5.56 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.82 | 10.17 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.46 | 1.41 | 245% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.68 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement