Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCIAX vs FKCIX
BCIAX vs FKCIX Comparison
Open Charts BCIAX vs FKCIX
BCIAX vs FKCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCIAX vs. FKCIX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCIAX is a Hold and FKCIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCIAX has more cash in the bank: 2.27B vs. FKCIX (1.41B). FKCIX pays higher dividends than BCIAX: FKCIX (3.53) vs BCIAX (2.88). BCIAX was incepted earlier than FKCIX: BCIAX (17 years) vs FKCIX (34 years). BCIAX (0.72) is less costly to investors than FKCIX (0.66). BCIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FKCIX (22.85). BCIAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FKCIX (2%) vs FKCIX (2%). FKCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCIAX: FKCIX (1000) vs BCIAX (2500). FKCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.13 vs. BCIAX (3.64). BCIAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.10 vs. FKCIX (1.05).
| BCIAX | FKCIX | BCIAX / FKCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.59 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.66 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.053 | 0.566 | 9% |
| Front Load | 5% | 2% | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.27B | 1.41B | 161% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 3.53 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.64 | 4.13 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.73 | 10.81 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.10 | 1.05 | 200% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.11 | 2.35 | 599% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers