Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCIAX vs NCMAX
BCIAX vs NCMAX Comparison
Open Charts BCIAX vs NCMAX
BCIAX vs NCMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCIAX vs. NCMAX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCIAX is a Hold and NCMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCIAX has more cash in the bank: 2.25B vs. NCMAX (259M). NCMAX pays higher dividends than BCIAX: NCMAX (2.95) vs BCIAX (2.79). BCIAX was incepted earlier than NCMAX: BCIAX (16 years) vs NCMAX (24 years). BCIAX (0.72) is less costly to investors than NCMAX (0.58). BCIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. NCMAX (16.00). NCMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCIAX: NCMAX (2000) vs BCIAX (2500). BCIAX (5.56) and NCMAX (5.48) have marching annual gain over last year. NCMAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.86 vs. BCIAX (3.46).
| BCIAX | NCMAX | BCIAX / NCMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.48 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.58 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.081 | 1.044 | 104% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.25B | 259M | 869% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 2.95 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.56 | 5.48 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.82 | 9.96 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.46 | 4.86 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.68 | 16.38 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement