Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCIAX vs NCMAX
BCIAX vs NCMAX Comparison
Open Charts BCIAX vs NCMAX
BCIAX vs NCMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCIAX vs. NCMAX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCIAX is a Hold and NCMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCIAX has more cash in the bank: 2.27B vs. NCMAX (214M). NCMAX pays higher dividends than BCIAX: NCMAX (3.03) vs BCIAX (2.88). BCIAX was incepted earlier than NCMAX: BCIAX (17 years) vs NCMAX (24 years). BCIAX (0.72) is less costly to investors than NCMAX (0.58). BCIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. NCMAX (14.00). NCMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCIAX: NCMAX (2000) vs BCIAX (2500). BCIAX (3.64) and NCMAX (3.47) have marching annual gain over last year. NCMAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.52 vs. BCIAX (2.10).
| BCIAX | NCMAX | BCIAX / NCMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.48 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.58 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.053 | 0.122 | 43% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.27B | 214M | 1,061% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 3.03 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.64 | 3.47 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.73 | 9.48 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.10 | 3.52 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.11 | 14.81 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement