Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCIAX vs SRCMX
BCIAX vs SRCMX Comparison
Open Charts BCIAX vs SRCMX
American Century CA Interm-T T-Fr Bd A
Price$11.22
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.03B
Principal California Municipal A
Price$9.79
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets637.51M
BCIAX vs SRCMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCIAX vs. SRCMX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCIAX is a Hold and SRCMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCIAX has more cash in the bank: 2.03B vs. SRCMX (638M). SRCMX pays higher dividends than BCIAX: SRCMX (3.40) vs BCIAX (2.74). BCIAX was incepted earlier than SRCMX: BCIAX (16 years) vs SRCMX (36 years). SRCMX (0.87) is less costly to investors than BCIAX (0.72). BCIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. SRCMX (35.90). BCIAX initial investment is less costly to investors than SRCMX (4%) vs SRCMX (4%). SRCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCIAX: SRCMX (1000) vs BCIAX (2500). BCIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.67 vs. SRCMX (1.34). BCIAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.22 vs. SRCMX (0.33).
| BCIAX | SRCMX | BCIAX / SRCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.87 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.87 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.226 | 1.828 | 122% |
| Front Load | 5% | 4% | 120% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.03B | 638M | 318% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.74 | 3.40 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.67 | 1.34 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.84 | 10.39 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.22 | 0.33 | 962% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.31 | 21.79 | 79% |