Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCIAX vs SRCMX
BCIAX vs SRCMX Comparison
Open Charts BCIAX vs SRCMX
BCIAX vs SRCMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCIAX vs. SRCMX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCIAX is a Hold and SRCMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCIAX has more cash in the bank: 2.19B vs. SRCMX (655M). SRCMX pays higher dividends than BCIAX: SRCMX (3.55) vs BCIAX (2.87). BCIAX was incepted earlier than SRCMX: BCIAX (17 years) vs SRCMX (37 years). SRCMX (0.85) is less costly to investors than BCIAX (0.72). BCIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. SRCMX (52.20). BCIAX initial investment is less costly to investors than SRCMX (4%) vs SRCMX (4%). SRCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCIAX: SRCMX (1000) vs BCIAX (2500). SRCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.36 vs. BCIAX (-0.61). BCIAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.06 vs. SRCMX (-4.49).
| BCIAX | SRCMX | BCIAX / SRCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.85 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.85 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.979 | -1.813 | 109% |
| Front Load | 5% | 4% | 120% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.19B | 655M | 334% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.87 | 3.55 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.61 | -0.36 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.38 | 8.21 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.06 | -4.49 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.44 | 12.48 | 100% |