Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCICX vs FHLKX
BCICX vs FHLKX Comparison
Open Charts BCICX vs FHLKX
BCICX vs FHLKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCICX vs. FHLKX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCICX is a Hold and FHLKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCICX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. FHLKX (73.1M). BCICX pays higher dividends than FHLKX: BCICX (4.93) vs FHLKX (2.86). BCICX was incepted earlier than FHLKX: BCICX (18 years) vs FHLKX (6 years). BCICX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FHLKX (0.40). BCICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FHLKX (54.00). FHLKX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCICX: FHLKX (0) vs BCICX (1000). FHLKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.90 vs. BCICX (8.95). FHLKX return over 5 years is better than : 22.45 vs. BCICX (16.22).
| BCICX | FHLKX | BCICX / FHLKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.39 | 403% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.40 | 423% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.033 | 7.127 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 73.1M | 14,364% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.93 | 2.86 | 172% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.95 | 14.90 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.38 | 34.64 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.22 | 22.45 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement