Ad is loading...
BCICX vs FTANX
BCICX vs FTANX Comparison
Open Charts BCICX vs FTANX
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Investor C
Price$10.12
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.25B
Fidelity Asset Manager 30%
Price$11.89
Change-$0.02 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
BCICX vs FTANX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCICX vs. FTANX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCICX is a Buy and FTANX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCICX has more cash in the bank: 10.2B vs. FTANX (1.94B). BCICX pays higher dividends than FTANX: BCICX (5.05) vs FTANX (2.99). BCICX was incepted earlier than FTANX: BCICX (17 years) vs FTANX (18 years). BCICX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FTANX (0.51). BCICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FTANX (19.00). FTANX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCICX: FTANX (0) vs BCICX (1000). FTANX IRA initial investment is lower compared to BCICX: FTANX (500) vs BCICX (100). BCICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.84 vs. FTANX (5.90). BCICX return over 5 years is better than : 24.39 vs. FTANX (21.09).
| BCICX | FTANX | BCICX / FTANX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.51 | 308% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.51 | 331% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.348 | 1.423 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100 | 500 | 20% |
| Net Assets | 10.2B | 1.94B | 525% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.05 | 2.99 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.84 | 5.90 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.38 | 13.46 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.39 | 21.09 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.15 | 34.42 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...