Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCICX vs FTANX
BCICX vs FTANX Comparison
Open Charts BCICX vs FTANX
BCICX vs FTANX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCICX vs. FTANX commentary
Aug 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCICX is a Hold and FTANX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCICX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. FTANX (2.19B). BCICX pays higher dividends than FTANX: BCICX (5.02) vs FTANX (2.69). BCICX was incepted earlier than FTANX: BCICX (18 years) vs FTANX (19 years). BCICX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FTANX (0.53). BCICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FTANX (24.00). FTANX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCICX: FTANX (0) vs BCICX (1000). FTANX IRA initial investment is lower compared to BCICX: FTANX (500) vs BCICX (100). FTANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.60 vs. BCICX (7.62). FTANX return over 5 years is better than : 19.48 vs. BCICX (17.35).
| BCICX | FTANX | BCICX / FTANX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.50 | 314% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.53 | 319% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.804 | 6.150 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100 | 500 | 20% |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 2.19B | 480% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.02 | 2.69 | 186% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.62 | 10.60 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.85 | 33.28 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.35 | 19.48 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.50 | 54.56 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers