Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCITX vs SRCMX
BCITX vs SRCMX Comparison
Open Charts BCITX vs SRCMX
BCITX vs SRCMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCITX vs. SRCMX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCITX is a Hold and SRCMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCITX has more cash in the bank: 2.19B vs. SRCMX (655M). SRCMX pays higher dividends than BCITX: SRCMX (3.55) vs BCITX (3.13). BCITX was incepted earlier than SRCMX: BCITX (43 years) vs SRCMX (37 years). SRCMX (0.85) is less costly to investors than BCITX (0.47). BCITX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. SRCMX (52.20). SRCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCITX: SRCMX (1000) vs BCITX (2500). SRCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.36 vs. BCITX (-0.46). BCITX return over 5 years is better than : 1.23 vs. SRCMX (-4.49).
| BCITX | SRCMX | BCITX / SRCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.85 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.85 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.906 | -1.813 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.19B | 655M | 334% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.13 | 3.55 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.46 | -0.36 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.19 | 8.21 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.23 | -4.49 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.19 | 12.48 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement