Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCLPX vs HMEAX
BCLPX vs HMEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCLPX vs. HMEAX commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCLPX is a Hold and HMEAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCLPX has more cash in the bank: 4.68B vs. HMEAX (1.17B). HMEAX pays higher dividends than BCLPX: HMEAX (4.78) vs BCLPX (3.49). BCLPX was incepted earlier than HMEAX: BCLPX (18 years) vs HMEAX (9 years). HMEAX (2.74) is less costly to investors than BCLPX (2.36). HMEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 406.00 vs. BCLPX (81.00). BCLPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMEAX: BCLPX (1000) vs HMEAX (2500). HMEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.12 vs. BCLPX (5.04). HMEAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.17 vs. BCLPX (7.66).
| BCLPX | HMEAX | BCLPX / HMEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.27 | 2.49 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.36 | 2.74 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.659 | 5.229 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.68B | 1.17B | 399% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.49 | 4.78 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.04 | 6.12 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.74 | 15.61 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.66 | 16.17 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement